Sections

End of the line: 50th anniversary of elevated train’s demise stirrs memories of Brooklyn’s past

The Myrtle El at the Washington Avenue station in Clinton Hill in 1969.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

As 66-year-old Fort Greene resident Saleem Ali strolls down Myrtle Avenue on a warm October day, he notices something missing in the clear blue sky overhead, and recalls a weathered mass of steel, the sun shining through slats of timber, and the distant rumble of an oncoming train.

It was loud and obtrusive, but 50 years following the Oct. 3 1969 final voyage of an elevated train line that once dominated the Myrtle Avenue skyline, Ali remembers a vital part of Brooklyn’s past and an iconic aspect of his own distant youth.

“That was our landmark,” said Ali. “For those of us who grew up with it to see it dismantled and disappear, it was a part of us.”

The Myrtle “El” shuffled straphangers for more than 80 years, during which its quaint, wooden passenger cars drove a wave of development that spread from the borough’s bustling industrial waterfront eastward through burgeoning brownstone neighborhoods and sheer on to the distant frontier of Queens, according to a transit historian.

“This was the beginning of brownstone Brooklyn growing up,” said Rob DelBagno of the New York Transit Museum. “The El extended over time east through what were then fairly rural areas, and Brooklyn developed along there and industrial Bushwick built up afterwards.”

The train line opened in April 1888, five years after Emily-Warren Roebling became the first person to cross the Brooklyn Bridge — holding a rooster, no less — and a decade before the great mistake, when the vibrant and independent port city of Brooklyn was folded into New York City as only one of five boroughs, according to the history buff.

The Myrtle Avenue line was powered by a heavy steam engine, which drove the elevated line from Adams Street in America’s Downtown through Fort Greene and forward to Grand Avenue in Clinton Hill, before later expanding further east into Bedford-Stuyvesant, Bushwick, and finally into Queens.
The transition to electric motors saw the line extended once again around the turn of the century, this time northward over the Brooklyn Bridge and into Manhattan, until 1944 when the line was shortened back to Bridge and Jay streets, according to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

But ridership started declining in the 1930s because of the Depression and because of the opening of the crosstown line which would later become the G train, according to the agency.

Elevated train lines were coming down all over the city during the mid-20th century in favor of subways and due to the increasing popularity of the automobile.

Around the same time, the city’s master builder Robert Moses erected the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, which tore through many of the neighborhoods near the Myrtle El.

In 1969, the recently-formed Metropolitan Transportation Authority — which took over the trains and bus lines across the city and state — studied reinforcing the tracks of the Myrtle El, to allow for steel cars to run along the line, which remained the last line in North America to still retain wooden passenger cars, but transit honchos decided against the costly upgrade, according to DelBagno.

“They figured they had better ways to spend the money,” the historian explained.

The agency ran the last train on midnight on Oct. 3 1969 and demolished the lines the next year, with only a short stretch remaining along what is now the M train between Myrtle-Broadway Station and Queens, along with a derelict span of tracks which juts out one block to Lewis Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant, which Borough President Eric Adams has proposed could be repurposed in a similar fashion to Manhattan’s High Line park.

The transit agency replaced the El with the B54 bus along the corridor, but a lot of the business suffered from the lower foot traffic afterward, according to DelBagno, who said the thoroughfare’s resurgence as a vital commercial strip is a fairly recent occurrence.

“A lot of stores and restaurants closed up because their customers were gone,” he said. “Myrtle Avenue was a pretty vibrant shopping avenue, a lot of that disappeared.”

That comeback is once again under threat, as the agency plans to cut service along the B54 and B38 routes, which spurred local residents and business owners to rally earlier this month.

But as transit aficionados gear up to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the death of the Myrtle Avenue line and the wealth of Brooklyn history it represents, for Ali, it conjures more personal memories of childhood derring-do, and he recalled scaling the elevated rail’s metal columns in search of fowl fit for the pigeons coups.

“It was high up there, but we took the chance and got some eggs and young pigeons and took them to the coup,” said Ali.

For others, however, the demolition of the garish elevated line was like lifting a veil off of the neighborhood’s stellar brownstone architecture, and came as a welcome relieve to those who lived under its shadow, according to one Clinton Hill resident, who lived in Bedford-Stuyvesant at the time.

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at kduggan@cnglocal.com. Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Posted 12:00 am, October 3, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
There were great memories on how these former elevated lines like the Myrtle Avenue Line had made NYC, especially in the outer boroughs, thrive overtime until it's demolition. Them again, the remaining elevated lines are very nostogic by personal standards.
Oct. 3, 8:40 am
DanG from Windsor Terrace says:
The slowdown in business on Myrtle Avenue was due to the closure of the Navy Yard, not the removal of the El.
Oct. 3, 6:59 pm
Glenn Krasner from Parkchester, the Bronx, NY says:
The so called Manhattan "High Line" last ran trains in 1981. Instead of a useless park for tourists, it could have been revitalized as a scenic train line connecting Hudson Yards to the West Village, butvthat naked too much sense.
Oct. 4, 9:02 am
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
BTW, this isn't the only remnant of an el left in NYC that is still standing today. If you go over to The Bronx near Yankee Stadium on Sedwick Avenue, you will see what's left of the 9th Avenue El. I'm very surprised that neither of those els were torn down even though their service was stopped decades ago whereas in many other places they were demolished shortly after being stopped. As for what's now the High Line, that was never for passenger service as it was mainly freight only as it was used to carry items between the buildings, which was later declared obsolete as trucks became dominant and could be done faster. However, it would be nice if service was restored on the former Rockaway Line over in Queens by making it into a subway or commuter train line, but I have a feeling that is a long shot and most likely won't happen in any generation.
Oct. 7, 9:24 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: