Upcoming Gowanus and Park Slope shelters feature massive price discrepancy

Coming soon: The city is planning to open a new homeless shelter in Gowanus, which will serve 116 displaced adults.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A new homeless shelter coming to Gowanus in November will cost taxpayers roughly half per unit as two massive shelters slated to open in nearby Park Slope the following month.

The new facility will occupy a recently constructed building on Third Avenue near Sixth Street originally planned as a hotel, where operator Praxis Housing will provide refuge for 116 adults in 58 two-person units, according to the Department of Homeless Services.

The Gowanus facility will provide around-the-clock security, feature a 10 p.m. curfew, and offer an on-site outdoor space for smoking and recreation, according to a Praxis rep.

City housing honchos have budgeted nearly $32 million over nine years for the Gowanus shelter, which includes both the cost of rent and social services. That budget — which equals slightly more than $5,100 per unit, per month — represents a worst-case estimate, and the real amount will be lowered after the deal is finalized in the coming weeks, according to a department spokeswoman.

Even with the artificially inflated number, the price for the Third Avenue shelter is substantially lower than two soon-to-open Fourth Avenue shelters — located at 535 and 555 Fourth avenues in Park Slope, and featuring a combined 253 housing units for families — which will cost taxpayers an average of more than $10,000 per unit, according to city data.

The Park Slope shelters — which will be run by non-profit Women In Need — have drawn fierce opposition from locals outraged by the sky-high price tag.

Matthew Borden, Assistant Commissioner of Government Affairs and External Relations at Department of Homeless Services, declined to answer questions regarding how the Third Avenue shelter’s $32 million price tag was calculated, and refused to explain the massive price disparity between the Gowanus Shelter and its Fourth Avenue counterparts at a Sept. 4 community meeting about the shelters, citing ongoing contract negotiations.

Homeless Services spokesman Isaac McGinn similarly refused to provide specifics regarding the agency’s deals with Women in Need and Praxis, saying neither contract has been finalized.

McGinn did, however, describe certain factors that can influence shelter costs, including differences in client population — in this case, families versus adults — security concerns, and the cost of renting property in Park Slope as opposed to Gowanus.

However, the greater part of funding for the Fourth Avenue shelters— roughly $6,000 on average per unit — is not earmarked for rent, but will go directly to Women in Need to provide security and social services. That figure is roughly twice what the shelter operator requires to manage another family shelter in Brownsville, according to a Gothamist report.

The push to build homeless housing in the area is part of the city’s “Turning the Tide on Homelessness” initiative, which calls for shelters to be more-evenly spread out across New York — rather than clustered in low-income areas, as they had historically been.

Community Board 6 — which encompasses Gowanus, Park Slope, and other nearby neighborhoods — has traditionally only featured one homeless facility, located in the Park Slope Armory on Eighth Avenue and 14th Street.

Councilman Brad Lander (D—Park Slope) pointed to the lack of shelter density in the area as evidence the neighborhood should be welcoming of more facilities.

“There’s 60,000 shelter beds in New York City, and 59 community boards. So, if we were spreading them out fairly, that’d be about 1,000 shelter beds in every community board,” he said. “We’ve historically only had about 100.”

Reach reporter Aidan Graham at or by calling (718) 260–4577. Follow him at
Updated 3:54 pm, September 5, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Charles from Bklyn says:
Sept. 5, 2019, 10:32 pm
Ross J from Park Slope says:
Our Park Slope neighborhood has a serious and urgent homelessness problem. Mere one block away under the Prospect Expressway there are multiple people suffering from homelessness and substance abuse. These shelters help address public health, education achievement for affected students, is morally right and a valid use of public dollars. No one blinks when luxury developers receive even greater dollars from taxpayers. I have great shame for my neighbors who are disguising their classism and bankrupt humanity behind this thin veneer good government concerns.
Sept. 7, 2019, 12:13 am
Sadiya N from Park Slope says:
You'd think after all these millions spent to shelter the homeless, they'd finally invest in universal health care. The ROOT of the problem! Put our tax money there!
Sept. 7, 2019, 6:57 am
Mark Corrigan from Gowanus says:
Dismayed there will be no vetting of residents for sex offenders or violent felons. Valid concern of site’s neighbors with young kids, and unfair to deserving shelter residents (who should be welcomed!). A glib/sanctimonious response from DHS surely not the way to secure community buy-in. Our electeds need to have constituents’ back here.
Sept. 7, 2019, 9:26 am
Nick T from Park Slope says:
No every concern about cost derives from supposed classism. Look at where the current shelters are and how the money is spent. We DO care about corporate hand outs, we care about root problems, and hey maybe you're right it's a wake-up call that it's coming to our neighborhood. Doesn't mean we're not morally right to say no to crappy government. If you are the arbiter of what is morally good/bad then go set up your own and ask for donations, or hey get a government contract and do it better. The way this city is trying to deal with homelessness is not doing anything more than continuing to fuel the causes of it then demand more money to spend to play fire fighter. If we say no to the stop gaps, maybe we can actually go after root causes.
Sept. 7, 2019, 10:30 am
concerned from Greenwood says:
What's the actual difference between running a shelter in Brownsville and running a shelter in Park Slope? Why would one cost more than running another in a different area of the borough? Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
Sept. 9, 2019, 1:06 pm
Mz from Nyc says:
Christine Quinn, CEO of WIN, getting a payday from taxpayers.
Sept. 10, 2019, 9:44 am
Josh Bernstein from Park Slope says:
At $10,000 per unit per month, a lot of people must be getting a payday. Including, I think: Brad Lander The sleezebag developers (Slate and Adam America) Christine Quinn and her for-profit "not-for profit" WIN Bill de Blasio (should check those campaign contributions) Others?
Sept. 10, 2019, 2:16 pm
jerry krase from park slope says:
the real culprit in the 4th avenue debacle is overdevelopment and bailing out politically connected developers who took advantage of easy publicly subsidized funds and taxes. relying on politicians to do objective planning always has been a terrible idea, not to mention bike lanes on 4th and 5th avenues.
Sept. 14, 2019, 11:36 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: