Sections

Gimme shelter: Park Slope residents sign petition in support of planned family shelters

Park Slope residents flocked to sign a petition supporting two proposed Fourth Avenue homeless shelters, which quickly outgrew another petition opposing the refuges.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

More than 1,600 people have signed a petition supporting the city’s plan to open two homeless shelters in Park Slope, backing the effort which has drawn fierce opposition from some locals since it was announced in April.

“I felt that people in the neighborhood were supportive of the plan, but where’s the evidence to back that up?” said Kathy Price, who stated the petition on June 13 on behalf of the civic engagement engagement group Citizen Squirrel. “I wanted to show the receipts.”

When city officials unveiled their proposal to open the two neighboring shelters — located at 535 and 555 Fourth avenues, and offering a combined 253 housing units — some Slope residents blasted the plan as harmful to the neighborhood.

In an effort to get the city to reconsider the plan, one community group launched an opposing petition protesting the shelters, which has gathered over 1,100 signatures since its creation on May 26.

The pro-shelter effort came as a direct response to that petition, which Price said dramatically overstated the anti-welfare sentiment among Park Slopers.

“I was disappointed by that petition when it was signed by 200 people,” she said. “When that number climbed to 800, I felt that it wasn’t reflective of the neighborho­od.”

Within days, the supportive petition overtook its protesting counterpart, which Price said proved her presumption.

“I was relieved and happy to see that what I felt about the neighborhood was panning out in the numbers,” she said. “1,500 signatures is where we can really declare victory.”

The shelters figure to occupy two buildings — a 12-story tower and its 11-story neighbor — which were originally intended as market-rate rentals before the city brokered a deal with the developers to house homeless families there.

Anti-shelter advocates raised concerns in their petition about the inevitable increased population density in the neighborhood, the potential impact on local schools, and the high price the city figures to pay to rent the space.

Local Councilman Brad Lander (D–Park Slope) defended the shelters — which are the brainchild of the Department of Homeless Services, not the City Council — arguing that the developments would bring more residents whether they were used for shelters or for private residents.

Additionally, Lander committed to providing the nearby public schools with additional resources to help integrate any new students who enrolled as a result of the shelters.

Paying market-rate prices for the units is unavoidable, according to Lander, who said the city does not own nearly enough housing units to dent the homeless problem. Still, critics charged that the agreement is providing an undue windfall to the properties’ developers, who stand to charge the city almost $11 million annually. Price started the petition before the city unveiled the project’s steep price tag, but called the cost-critique unwarranted, speculating that spending-hawks were using the criticism to hide anti-shelter bias.

“If we’re really talking about technical, financial details, it makes me wonder — would this ever apply to another building that was both useful and necessary to a community?” she asked. “I don’t think so.”

The major point of tension for many anti-shelter demonstrators, however, is the potential negative impact on local property values. Shruti Kapoor — who authored the anti-shelter petition in May — questioned Department of Homeless Service reps’ claims that shelters do not affect the value of neighboring homes.

“Even though in the town hall they said historically there’s no data that shows property values aren’t affected by shelters, the fact is there’s very little date on this type of huge… we’re not talking about one shelter, we’re talking about two huge shelters near our properties,” Kapoor said. “There’s no doubt this will have a negative impact on the property value.”

Price bushed off the property value questions, pointing to a Kensington homeless shelter that has ingratiated itself with the neighborhood, as evidence that shelters can be a net-positive neighbor.

“All I can do is look at the facts,” said Price. “I’ve decided that, based on what we know about other family shelters and the effects they have on other communities, that this can be a good thing for the community.”

Reach reporter Aidan Graham at agraham@schnepsmedia.com or by calling (718) 260–4577. Follow him at twitter.com/aidangraham95.
Updated 12:16 pm, June 20, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Somebody from Somewhere says:
If they just OK'ed a shelter on billionaire's row, what makes you think this wont get OK'ed?
June 20, 9:14 am
Jon from Windsor Terrace says:
A petition to support homeless shelters seems to be work of Brad Lander, who has done everything to screw up the city. Lander, has already interfered with the area's good public schools, of course Lander did this after his own children graduated. Lander is out to destroy the good of this city. Lander has no respect for those who served out country as he has repeatedly sat for our national anthem. Lander rarely thinks before talking. For example, Lander has blocked the F Train express, been a leader to raise the minimum raise to $15 but never thought how it affects the consumers who must wait long on shopping lines and pay more for our goods, pushed through a regressive shopping bag tax while banning plastic as Lander has a thing against plastic. Lander appears not to be bright enough to do research as if he or had someone else do his homework, Lander would understand that there is no plastic bag pollution along the US East Coast and is only found 15,000 miles away in the Asian Pacific Ocean.
June 20, 10:18 am
AlmadeCubano from Gowanus says:
There's no doubt the developers of these projects paid De Blasio so he would return the favor and overpay them. Remember the numerous stop-work orders? The concrete poured in freezing weather? I can guess how this ends: the city of new york realizes the buildings need major repairs, and you and I get to pay for it. While De Blasio hides more money in Panama and Switzerland.
June 20, 11:11 am
Charles from Bklyn says:
So what? Corruption is still corruption, even when supported. These shelters are a bailout of a developer who couldn't build these buildings correctly, and now has tax payers to foot the bill plus profits. It's pathetic that we can only do a good thing by doing a bad thing as well. Further, there are more than 1600 foolish people who believe this issue is only about assisting homeless families. Talk about putting your head in the sand.
June 20, 11:17 am
Me from here from Park Slope says:
Does Ms. Price own a home near the proposed shelters? How about any of the 1600 signers of her petition?
June 20, 1:03 pm
Dmitri from Coney Island says:
Normally I despise the city for catering to the homeless, but since this is in Park Slope I applaud it - because screw that libtard neighborhood. MAGA.
June 20, 9:08 pm
Brooklyn from Park slope says:
Dmitri you are a racist. Are you a graduate of Trump University?
June 22, 7:31 am
Pre-gentrif*cked Brooklynite from The 9th Circle of Leftist Liberal Self Entitled Elitist Pr*cks ofa Gentrif*cked Hell, better known as Park Slope says:
Kudos to Dmitri, who's 1,000% correct. Living amongst them (or, more accurately, attempting to) with all their hypocritical, self righteous smugness truly IS a living hell! Ugh! Actually I'm glad they're pro-abortion: One less "Keebler" (yes, a kid's name I heard a hipster "father" whining in Prospect Park, in attempt to get him back to their artisanal picnic blanket) to deal with. No small wonder my neighbors fled to Gerritsen Beach. They couldn't stomach one more minute here. It's the ANTI Park Slope!!!
June 22, 8:09 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: