Sections

CB2 committee votes in favor of mayor’s borough jails plan

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Members of Community Board 2’s Land Use Committee voted in favor of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s plan to tear down Atlantic Avenue’s House of Detention to make way for a larger jail in order to close down Rikers Island.

The committee issued their recommendation at an April 16 meeting to accept the city’s proposal to close the beleaguered jail complex by 2027 and move its incarcerated people to four borough-based jails with several conditions, including lowering the city’s target population and cutting the building’s proposed size by almost half.

The group’s conditions came from a list of amendments which the influential civic group Brooklyn Heights Association distributed as a leaflet at the meeting and which a member of both the association and the committee voted to include in the recommendation.

The conditions are that the city construct a building slightly more than half the floor area ratio compared to the city’s proposal, with no more than 875 incarcerated people in it, as opposed to 1,437.

The community board also said that the city must expand their alternative sentencing programs, create a new and improved training facility for guards, and build a jail on Staten Island — the only borough exempt from the mayor’s plan.

Several representatives from the mayor’s office and the Department of Correction presented their plans for the new jail between Boerum Place and Smith Street to the committee, similarly to the community board’s packed public hearing on April 11.

Many committee members asked the bureaucrats why they didn’t readjust their proposal in light of recent legislative changes in Albany with one civic guru accusing the city of trying to strong-arm the local community into accepting larger jails in order to close Rikers.

“You’re proposing a building that — I think by-and-large you’ve heard from everyone that testified — is too big,” said Irene Janner. “You’re trying to fast-track this and you leave us in a quandary of do we vote yes and hope you shrink it, or do we insist you shrink it now because we know it is not acceptable as presented.”

State legislators passed a sweeping package of reforms on April 1, which will end cash bail and pretrial detention for almost all misdemeanor and nonviolent felony defendants, among other reforms, and which will reduce the amount of people awaiting trial in jail because they can’t afford bail.

The legislation will not come into effect until Jan. 1, 2020, but a recent study by the criminal justice reform advocacy group the Center for Court Innovation found that more than two out five people detained pretrial in the five boroughs would have been released under the new laws.

The mayor’s office launched a feasibility study to explore moving mentally ill inmates to hospitals, which could further reduce the population in the borough jails, as first reported by The City.

Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez also announced that his office would reduce excessive incarceration under his Justice 2020 plan in March.

A senior representative for the mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice Initiatives told the committee that her team wanted to guarantee that no one would be left behind on Rikers Island if the new facilities ended up being too small, which led them to aim for 5,000 incarcerated people in accordance with the 2017 findings of the independent commission on the city’s incarceration reform led by Judge Jonathan Lippman.

“We are committed to not leaving anyone on Rikers Island. So what we don’t want to do is in trying to plan for what is not reasonable for us to achieve while we continue to push in every way shape and form that we can to make sure that everybody we can get out of detention is in community-based supervision or not in the justice system,” said Dana Kaplan.

The official said that the city could however adjust its plans during or after the ongoing Uniform Land Use Review Process, which it must pass before it can break ground, depending on the impacts of these reforms.

“We’re not fixed on 5,000. We believed that was the most prudent way to plan at the time and that is the capacity that we’re proposing,” she said. “As we are able to see what the impacts are of these legislative reforms, we can adjust that number. That number can be adjusted both during ULURP and it can be adjusted after ULURP.”

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at kduggan@cnglocal.com. Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 5:11 pm, April 22, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Sid from Boerum Hill says:
No one trusts them to adjust it after ULURP...ULURP is the one shot to get this right and work with the community. They need the electeds approval...They need to get it down close to what the board recommends. All the other Boroughs will probably sue..This is the one community willing to work with them and they keep thumbing their noses at us...
April 22, 12:02 pm
Sid from Boerum Hill says:
If they are wrong, the Lippman commission envisioned 20 smaller jails...So they could do at least two in Brooklyn if necessary(the other on the grounds of Kings country hospital if necessary- approximately 20 % of the incarcerated are severely mentally ill and another 20% are just mentally ill).
April 22, 12:06 pm
Glenn Krasner from Parkchester, Bronx, NY says:
If I am not mistaken, the City of New York spent about $20 million about 5 years ago to renovate this facility, and now they are going to tear it down? There is something wrong with that picture!
April 23, 10:07 am
Sid from Boerum Hill says:
That brings back old memories...and probably some inaccurate ones. The rehab of the jail started about 20 years ago(and maybe longer). The contractor died and the City tried to collect on the performance bond. The bonding company wanted to finish the project as it would be cheaper than the the whole bond. Litigation ensued. The bonding company either won the right to finish or the City settled for them to do it. The rehab was by then obsolete and probably next to useless. but they finished it anyway.
April 23, 7:05 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: