Council calls on Albany to pass speed-camera expansion bill

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

It’s not camera shy!

Council voted overwhelmingly in favor of a resolution calling on state elected officials to pass a Bay Ridge pol’s bill to preserve and massively expand the city’s school-zone speed-camera system.

The city’s legislative body on Wednesday voted 44–3 to pass the so-called Home Rule Request, which is required because state Sen. Andrew Gounardes’s proposed law to more than quintuple the current 140 cameras around schools in the five boroughs would only affect the city if passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Cuomo.

Councilman Kalman Yeger (D—Bensonhurst) was the only Kings County member, and the only Democrat, to oppose the resolution.

Should the bill become law, it would authorize the city to add up to 610 more cameras across the city’s 2,300 school zones, where 140 are currently in place, and automatically photograph the license plates of cars driving thirty miles-per hour or more in school zones, sending those vehicles’ registered owners $50 tickets.

The proposed legislation would also:

• Lengthen the hours the cameras are on, extending their current operating times from an hour before and after school is in session to between 6 am and 10 pm on weekdays.

• Broaden the areas where the cameras operate, allowing officials to install them within a quarter-mile radius of schools, not just within a quarter-mile stretch of the same street a given school is on as current law allows.

• Require the city to hang signs in school zones with speed cameras that warn drivers of the technology’s presence.

• Mandate local officials prioritize placing the cameras in school zones with higher rates of speeding and crashes.

• Require the city to submit annual reports to the governor and leadership of both chambers of the Legislature with data including the total amount of ticket revenue that local officials spent on traffic and pedestrian safety measures, as well as “the effectiveness and adequacy of the [expanded] hours of operation.”

Data shows that the already in place speed cameras work. In the two years after officials first installed them in 2014, there were 60-percent fewer daily violations in school zones with speed cameras, according to a report published by the Department of Transportation last year. And the majority of Gounardes’ constituents support expanding their presence, according to a 2018 poll commissioned by street-safety group Transportation Alternatives.

The bill will now have to make it through three committees in the Assembly — where Manhattan Assemblywoman Deborah Glick introduced her version of the legislation earlier this month — before it can proceed to a floor vote in the state Senate, according to a spokesman for Gounardes.

And Cuomo would ultimately need to sign off on the legislation — which Gounardes previously told this newspaper he predicts will occur without a hitch if it makes it to the governor’s desk.

If Cuomo okays the bill, it would become law 30 days after he signs it, and would be valid through June 30, 2022.

Reach reporter Julianne McShane at (718) 260–2523 or by e-mail at Follow her on Twitter @juliannemcshane.
Posted 12:00 am, March 15, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

John from Bay Ridge says:
Let’s stop pretending that the speed cameras are only needed near schools, it that they should only operate during limited hours. I want these speed cameras spread all around and to operate 24/7. I also want red light cameras and cameras at stop signs. That is the only way to change driver behavior.
March 15, 2019, 6:26 am
Frank from Furter says:
aren't the speed cameras set at 11 mph over the limit? at 36 not this something new?
March 15, 2019, 7:32 am
Henry Ford from Bay Ridge says:
Agreed with John from Bay Ridge. Motorists cannot be trusted to follow the law and the only way to get them to slowdown it to hit them in the wallet. Then should go a step further and impound the vehicle when they don't pay up, then jail.
March 15, 2019, 7:40 am
Police State from NYC says:
Enough already! These Cameras are infringing on our privacy and are entrapment. Grooves in the street like those before toll booths are more than adequate to bring awareness to special speed zones and deter speeding. The public is not here to be turned into "the bad guys" to justify governmental harassment and revenue production (aka fines!). Stop the Police State! Prevention, awareness and education is a far more productive and civil approach.
March 15, 2019, 10:10 am
Pedestrian from Downtown Brooklyn says:
How about changing the rules so NYC can put in all the speed and red light cameras they want without needing Albany to be involved at all? That's home rule!
March 15, 2019, 10:12 am
Tal Bazilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
When it's about revenue, we know that safety isn't the primary issue here.
March 18, 2019, 1:20 pm
Frank from Furter says:
It passed...awaiting the govs signature..
March 19, 2019, 6:12 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: