Road to change: Hizzoner demands Albany pass suite of laws to make streets safer

Bill’s bills: Mayor DeBlasio proposed new legislation to make city streets safer at a press conference in Prospect Heights on Thursday.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

State leaders must pass laws that put more speed cameras on city streets, heighten punishments dealt to reckless motorists caught on those devices, and mandate doctors inform officials of drivers’ potentially debilitating health conditions, Mayor DeBlasio demanded on Thursday.

“For too long people could negligently kill another human being with a vehicle and essentially walk away, we’ve got to end that once and for all,” Hizzoner said at a press conference inside the 78th Precinct’s Sixth Avenue station house, not far from where a driver blew a red light and killed two young kids crossing a Park Slope street last week.

The mayor first called for a bill to install an extra 150 speed cameras around schools citywide, in addition to expanding what constitutes a school zone so that the devices can be placed on streets that approach learning houses, not just roads that border them — which are the only streets state law currently permits cameras on, regardless of where local officials believe they’d be the most effective, DeBlasio said.

“We need to be able to put the cameras where the NYPD and DOT know they will do the most good,” he said.

Mayor DeBlasio claimed that if his proposed law was already in place, it would have allowed speed cameras at the intersection of Ninth Street and Fifth Avenue, which is a few blocks away from Park Slope’s MS 51 and where Staten Island resident Dorothy Bruns plowed into five people on March 5, killing 1-year-old Joshua Lew and 4-year-old Abigail Blumenstein, and injuring each child’s mother and another man.

DeBlasio then demanded legislation that suspends the vehicle registration of cars caught more than five times by speed and red-light cameras within a two-year period.

Motorists currently captured speeding or running red lights on camera are subject to fines, which the mayor said would increase under his proposed law. But unlike cops, whose traffic-violation summonses come with points against individual drivers’ licenses, the state cannot revoke a license for infractions caught on film, because cameras only record the car’s license-place number, not the person behind the wheel.

The white Volvo Bruns was driving, for instance, had no less than 12 violations when she smashed into the youngsters, city records show, but none of those infractions were dealt to the motorist herself.

And it shouldn’t matter whether a car owner is personally reckless or permits another rogue driver to operate their vehicle, because either scenario results in less-safe streets, according to DeBlasio, who implored Albany to pull four-wheelers that rack up repeated camera infractions from roads.

“You shouldn’t be able to hide behind the fact that the car is registered to you, but maybe someone else was driving,” DeBlasio said. “You have to take responsibility for your own vehicle.”

Under the mayor’s proposed legislation, registrations for a total of 34,134 cars would have been suspended between April 2016 and March 2017 because they were caught more than five times on traffic cameras, according to city records.

DeBlasio’s third legislative demand would require physicians to notify the Department of Motor Vehicles upon diagnosing patients with illnesses such as recurring seizures — which investigators believe may have caused Bruns to slam into the victims — or sudden losses of consciousness that can impair their driving ability.

The bill is modeled after a law in New Jersey, which requires doctors to file a medical-emergency report with the distant state’s motor-vehicle agency if they deem a patient unfit to drive. The report can result in indefinite license suspension, license restrictions, additional tests, or no action, with a little more than half of cases being referred to physicians on the motor-vehicle agency’s medical-advisory panel.

If passed, New York state’s legislation would similarly empower its motor-vehicle agency to revoke a person’s license at the advice of a doctor.

The mayor’s last proposed law followed similar legislation introduced on March 9 by State Sen. Jesse Hamilton (D–Crown Heights) and Assemblyman Robert Carroll (D–Park Slope), who also crafted a bill that would put registrations of repeat offenders caught on camera in jeopardy, but under less stringent criteria than DeBlasio demanded, and with no provision to increase fines.

Reach reporter Colin Mixson at or by calling (718) 260-4505.
Updated 5:47 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Mike from Williamsburg says:
Why did this even guy run for mayor? The mayor of New York City has a lot of authority over many things, especially over street design and traffic enforcement.

If this guy cared, he could do something. He has all the authority he needs. But if he isn't even interested in using the powers that come with the office, why did he even run? Why doesn't he resign? Is he only mayor because he enjoys the invitation to go on Brian Lehrer every Friday?
March 16, 2018, 10:32 am
Homey from Crooklyn says:
Duh, what else can empty suits with no real world skills do except go into politics?
March 16, 2018, 10:49 am
Sean F from Bensonhurst says:
He's once again talking out his ass. You can't increase the penalties through the use street cameras because you can't prove who is behind the wheel. All you can do is ticket the vehicle's owner. You can't even assess points. He's such an idiot.
March 16, 2018, 4:52 pm
Rufus Leaking from BH says:
Can't wait for driverless cars! That'll fix everything!
March 17, 2018, 8:31 am
Tyler from pps says:
Sean F -- Suspension of a car's registration and increased fines for the vehicle would have nothing to do with the specific driver.

If your vehicle is being used to drive dangerously (running red lights and speeding) or to block bus lanes, the owner of the car is responsible. Period. It doesn't matter who is driving it.
March 17, 2018, 2:43 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
The only way to make the streets safer is to everybody follow the traffic laws and have better enforcement for that with no exceptions. By that, I mean including pedestrians and cyclists as well. Unfortunately, the anti-car fanatics will be crying foul to this. Until everybody does follow the rules, the streets will never be safe. In reality, when a pedestrian and/or cyclist flouts the laws, they actually are placing themselves into harm's why. For the record, I do call out reckless driving, but I would like to see some of you anti-car fanatics call out your kind that flouts traffic laws as well.
March 17, 2018, 3:49 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
The best this for me to do is shut my big fat retarded fukkking mouth!
March 17, 2018, 3:57 pm
Paul from Park Slope says:
Roads would be safer with no motor vehicles.
March 17, 2018, 4:54 pm
ty from pps says:
Just wait for driverless bikes
March 17, 2018, 7:42 pm
Tyler from pps says:
Vanessa -- Easy parking availability is like #27 on the list of priorities...
March 18, 2018, 10:38 am
Gary from Fort Greene says:
Tyler - unless there is a very large problem with the person who is driving the owner's car, the owner is NOT responsible for driving infractions. If you loan your car to a known maniac, drunk, etc., you the owner might have some responsibility for the harm caused - but not otherwise.
March 18, 2018, 11:39 am
Tyler from pps says:
So.... Gary. You don't think you have any responsibility if you lend your car to someone who REGULARLY runs red lights or REGULARLY speeds?

That's what we're talking about here. Not one infraction, but multiple.

If whoever is driving your car does something so much, I'm not sure how you don't think it's reasonable to revoke the registration for that vehicle. You're not responsible enough to lend your car to a safe driver, you're not responsible enough to keep the car registered. If nothing else, your insurance company should be told that your car is being used in such a manner.
March 18, 2018, 2:03 pm
Sean F from Bensonhurst says:
Tyler - Nothing in that plan prevents the actual speedster dangerous driver from using someone else's car. Dunning the owner is, at best, a mild deterrent. But there's nothing that can be done by the State or City against the actual person behind the wheel if it's not the owner.
March 21, 2018, 12:23 pm
Sean F from Bensonhurst says:
I can't wait for driverless bicycles and robot pedestrians. That will fix everything!
March 21, 2018, 12:23 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: