Sections

ON BPR ►Audio

Noah Hurowitz and Ross Barkan discuss the downfall of DNA Info and Gothamist

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Brooklyn Paper Radio

The reporters at DNA Info are martyrs for the cause of organized labor who just wanted to have a say in how their business was run, and they do not regret their decision to unionize even though they knew doing so could mean they’d lose their jobs, former staffer Noah Hurowitz claimed on the latest edition of Brooklyn Paper Radio.

“This was largely not about money or benefits, it was about a collective voice for the editorial employees that we didn’t feel was protected and respected,” Hurowitz told host and Brooklyn Paper editor-in-chief Vince DiMiceli. “Maybe if you listen to the troops in the trenches a little more, you’ll be more successful.”

Of course, now that billionaire Joe Ricketts has closed the site, the fruits of such a collaboration will never see the light of day, and that’s too bad, according to freelance journalist Ross Barkan, whose Columbia Journalism Review piece on the closure likened it to the end of community journalism as we know it. He added on the show that the loss of Gothamist, which Ricketts purchased and combined with DNA Info less than a year ago, was the latest closure of a newspaper or website willing to take a stand on things, as opposed to just reporting the news.

“Gawker and Gothamist were very up-front about their opinions and were very willing to go on crusades and write with a sense of righteousn­ess,” he said. “Those places that really had value in New York City no longer exist, and that is a major loss as well.”

A long-time listener and first-time caller then hijacked the show, wondering if the answer for community news is to get readers to pay subscriptions to help pay for the costs of doing business — something he said he was willing to do for a site like DNA Info or Gothamist.

That opened the door to the question of whether aggregators like Facebook or Google should help pay for the news sites that grease their users wheels lest they run out of content.

“Facebook is starting to understand that they are now in the news business,” Barkan said. “They’ve woken up to the reality that this isn’t just a place where people talk about their pet cat. It’s also the place where people get their news. My hope is Facebook understands it has an obligation to the news industry, and to be something of a news organization in itself. That means having editors curate news and the feed so you don’t see such a wild spread of misinforma­tion.”

In the end Barkan wondered if Facebook and Google will one day do something they’ve never done in the past: cut news organizations in on the action.

“They need to stop being money-hungry capitalists for a second and consider the well being of democracies,” he said. “They are worth many, many billions of dollars. You can take a fraction of the revenue they take in and subsidize many news organizations. Maybe Mark Zuckerberg is more of an altruist than I think.”

Hurowitz, though, had a different approach.

“Get me in a room with Mark Zuckerberg and I will shake him upside down and I guarantee you’ll have enough money to run a website,” he joked.

Brooklyn Paper radio is recorded and podcast live every Tuesday at 3:30 pm — for your convenience — from our studio in America’s Downtown and can be found, as always, right here on BrooklynPaper.com, on iTunes, and of course, on Stitcher.

Updated 12:04 pm, November 20, 2017
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

bkmanposeur from williamsburg says:
I blame all this on Jen Chung and Jake Dobkin's greed. They were well aware of the Ricket's clan conservatism.
The Gothamist has always been my source for the local beat news and snark and as a beacon to keep people informed of local event that had a daily impact on my life and many others, especially in "hipster brooklyn".
I can only hope something else will rise up in the ashes of all this.
Nov. 20, 8:31 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!