Up in the air: New justice assigned to Pier 6 case as towers continue to rise

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Talk about a deep bench.

The court case over two towers planned for Pier 6 in Brooklyn Bridge Park is being assigned to a new justice after four months of arguments that were supposed to conclude this month, and construction on the high-rises can proceed in the meantime, the judge currently presiding over the case ruled on Friday.

Justice Lucy Billings began hearing the Brooklyn Heights Association’s arguments against the development at the foot of Atlantic Avenue in April, but was instructed to give up the legal battle after being recently assigned to oversee asbestos litigation, she said.

The new judge, Justice Carmen Victoria St. George, will now decide whether to accept or reject the civic group’s claim that building the towers at Pier 6 violates the terms of a 2006 agreement that mandates park honchos only erect as much housing in the green space as is needed to maintain it.

But construction on the high-rises, which got underway last month, will be allowed continue as long as nothing is built that can’t be undone, the outgoing judge said in response to the Heights Association’s demand for an injunction halting work until the court rules.

The civic group’s injunction request followed its attempt to get Billings to stop construction in an emergency hearing last month, which she denied because she did not find the activity to be unlawful. But the judge guaranteed the Heights Association that the final ruling would not be influenced by how much work is complete, telling lawyers for the park, “I can’t see anything that can’t be undone.”

More than 400 steel beams are now being hammered into the ground as part of the project’s first phase, which will be followed by concrete pouring. Developers RAL Development Services and Oliver’s Realty Group need to decide whether it is worth going ahead with additional construction given they may need to pay to undo it, but a rep for the green space said the builders will move forward without delay.

“Today’s outcome does not affect our progress and construction will proceed as planned,” said spokeswoman Sarah Krauss.

Now that the case has been reassigned, its transcripts and filings will be passed onto St. George, who will read them and decide whether she can make a ruling or needs to call the litigants back into court.

The transcripts will include the Heights Associations’ argument as to why at least one of the towers should be blocked, which reasons that because the high-rise will contain below-market-rate housing, it does not uphold the 2006 agreement’s terms that development parcels within the park must be used to make money.

The neighborhood group’s attorney said he was happy with Friday’s proceedings.

“We’re pleased with the outcome of today’s ruling, which demonstrates the court has taken the BHA’s claims very seriously,” said Richard Ziegler. “The preliminary injunction ensures when the case is finally decided the fact that construction will proceed in the meantime won’t affect the final ruling.”

St. George was appointed to the state Supreme Court bench in June after working as an associate for Weitz & Luxenberg, a firm known to fight for plaintiffs or “the little guy.”

Reach reporter Lauren Gill at or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow her on Twitter @laurenk_gill
Updated 5:56 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

freddy from slope says:
judge says they will address the issues even if building has started.

judge in gone.

replaced by recently elected who needs to feed her masters.
Aug. 5, 2017, 10:09 am
Frank from Furter says:
Makes little sense to me. It's decision time. Write it. It what the appeal court does later.
Aug. 5, 2017, 7:09 pm
Dean Collins from Brooklyn heights says:
Ridiculous, these buildings should have been allowed to be built years ago.

Its such a shame that in this day and age.....some people still want segregation and the real issue here is the low cost housing.

If was all expensive apartments and rich snobs there wouldn't have been a problem all along.
Aug. 6, 2017, 7 am
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
Wow, they're not even trying to hide it are they...
Aug. 6, 2017, 12:49 pm
Clarence from Cobble Hill says:
And just where is all the money going? Straight to the Mayor's office! No surprise there. He's just funneling the money out of this project and right into his own pockets. I've never seen anything so scandalous. Of course many commenters here are just pawns of the system, trying to hide this fact.
Aug. 7, 2017, 9:29 am
ujh from Brooklyn says:
Lauren Gill and her enablers at the Brooklyn Paper have been feeding an attention-grabbing frenzy and need to stop putting out misleading reports. Drilling into the ground does not constitute construction. NOTHING is being built on these lots YET.
Aug. 7, 2017, 1:40 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: