Cable companies charge for old free TV

Brooklyn Daily
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Buyer beware again!

In early April, I shared the saga of the duplicitous scams that credit card companies are playing. My daughter and I suffered through Macy’s fraudulent interest fee of two bucks on a paid-off balance, and my BFF Donna was charged a $2 fee for residual interest on a zero balance from a major bank card.

Now I’m adding Fios to the list.

Long ago, when TV was free, you had the basic channels — 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 11 — and everyone could tune in and watch their weekly shows. It was fine, good, family entertainment. However, we got sold every item that the FCC and the advertisers pushed our way over the airwaves. The networks made money by selling ad spots and sponsorships. These interruptions were annoying and people did not like to have pesky ads shoved down their throats as they anesthetized in front of the tube.

To combat this, savvy folks decided to cash in on our unhappiness and invented the cable concept. By sending programs directly into our televisions on a wire, and charging a small fee (ain’t there always) for the privilege, viewers could watch a show without any commercial interruption and watch whatever content without censorship. Oh, what a guilty pleasure.

Of course, with all things guilty and pleasurable there were catches — one, they never last long enough, and two, cable channels were not readily available. Fast forward to today, where mega-channel packages from mega-cable conglomerates rule the idiot box — Fios, Spectrum, Optimum — you even need a cable hookup to view free channels. Ain’t that a kick in the head.

Which brings me to my BFF Donna. She has Fios as a provider with loads of premium channels. Recently she wanted to watch a “Saturday Night Live” episode that had aired several weeks ago. She clicked on the On-Demand feature, found the program, and hit enter. Much to her chagrin, there appeared on the screen a message that in order to view that episode she had to pay $2.99.

What? Pay $2.99 to see a show that was free in the first place? “They must be kidding,” she thought. But no siree, they weren’t. With a bit of sleuthing, she discovered that NBC wasn’t the only one putting a price for on-demand features — it seems the other major networks had also jumped on the scam wagon and were charging.

Really, as if a hefty monthly price for the privilege of watching television is not enough, the networks still have the nerve to charge for old shows? Wow, how low does greed go?

Not for Nuthin™, but shouldn’t the concept of free mean free? Right about now, Filo Farnsworth is turning over in his crypt.

Follow me on Twitter @JDelBuono.

Joanna DelBuono writes about national issues every Wednesday on E-mail her at
Updated 11:48 am, January 16, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: