Parents: Bridge Park’s floating pool plan doesn’t hold water

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Talk about a pipe dream.

Brooklyn Bridge Park is closing its popular pool at the end of this summer, and park officials say the only chance of replacing it is a fanciful plan to build privately funded floating swimming hole in the East River that is years and millions of dollars off being a reality. But even if it does comes to fruition, locals say it will be no replacement for the beloved family-friendly paddling pool and its adjacent sandy play area.

“It’s whack,” said Fort Greene dad Kevin Cummings, who takes his 7-year-old son to the pool at least twice a week. “It’s not kid-friendly — this is better for the kids because you’ve got the sand beach here where kids can play.”

Area parents recently mounted a campaign demanding the park keep the so-called “pop-up” pool, which has been open every summer near Pier 2 since 2012, but park honchos say it was never meant to be a permanent fixture and they can’t afford to keep it up and running.

Instead, they’re filling the space with more greenery, and are gunning to bring a private project called +Pool to the park’s shores — a Manhattan design firm’s dream of building an Olympic-sized swimming space in the shape of a plus sign that would use filtered water from the murky waterway.

“We are preparing to move ahead with expansion of parkland at this site,” said park president Regina Myer in a letter to local politicians who had fought to keep the swimming facility. “The budget does not including funding for a permanent pool. We believe that a floating pool is the most feasible means of providing a swimming pool at BBP.”

But the +Pool people say they have only raised $1 million of the $20 million they need to create their buoyant public bath, and it would take two years to actually build it.

If and when they do make it, Brooklyn Bridge Park is only one of nine sites they are considering — it may go near the new waterfront Domino sugar factory development in Williamsburg or off Transmitter Park in Greenpoint, according to +Pool spokeswoman Kara Meyer.

Myer said Brooklyn Bridge Park — which hosted a state-funded pool on a barge in 2007 — would still happily house a different floating pool, though the funding wouldn’t come out of park coffers.

It applied to build a dock to moor such a facility in 2010, but at the time admitted it didn’t have the $5–10 million it would need just to build that.

One local pol said he is on board with the whimsical floating pool idea and finding money for it, but in the mean time, the park needs to find a way to keep the pop-up pool running so residents aren’t left high and dry.

“It’s critical that the pop-up pool not be eliminated in the interim,” said state Sen. Daniel Squadron (D–Brooklyn Heights). “I’ll keep pushing … to maintain the pop-up pool and bring a permanent pool to the park.”

Reach reporter Lauren Gill at or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow her on Twitter @laurenk_gill
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

John R from Brooklyn Heights says:
So they can't afford to maintain a small popup swimming pool, but they can afford to raise $20 million to build an olympic size pool in the river and maintain that? I am sure that will last as long as the bouncy bridge they built. The park officials clearly incompetent as are our politicians who allow this sort of nonsense.
July 21, 2016, 8:54 am
sid from boerum hill says:
The floating pool was by far the most expensive pool the city parks department has ever operated. It cost 3 or 4 times the operating cost of the land based pools the city maintains. The pop up pools costs an order of magnitude less. The floating pool barge is up in the Bronx some-place if it still exists at all. While its true the park maintains a water park for cooling and splashing, it would seem to me that the park could maintain for relatively little cost the pop up.
July 21, 2016, 10:45 am
b says:
Which of the two pools is most environmentally sustainable?
July 21, 2016, 12:25 pm
Daan Roosegaarde from B.I.Q Building says:
Can the floating pool breathe out cleaner h2o than it takes in, similar to 4xSqr's air filtration system? (too bad the solar curtain wall doesn't face the sun)
July 21, 2016, 5:30 pm
Muzak says:
Imagine if B.I.Q's Solar Leaf panels moved w the sun, as Carl Icahn Laboratory's louvers do?
July 21, 2016, 5:47 pm
Brooklyn Dad from park slope says:
The important issue is that children from other areas of Brooklyn will have access,we need parking for buses and eating areas and the pool should also be open late at night for teens ,we need places to our children to go.
July 25, 2016, 8:53 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: