History in the taking! Landmarks OKs Park Slope Historic District expansion, but preservationists want more

for Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Brooklyn’s largest historic district is about to get even larger — but still not large enough, as far as preservationists are concerned.

The borough’s Brownstone boosters are celebrating after the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission voted to approve a second expansion of the Park Slope Historic District on Tuesday following years of lobbying, but say they won’t be truly satisfied until the entire neighborhood is wrapped in red tape.

“It took a long time but we’re pleased its finally happened,” said Simon Bankoff of preservation advocacy group the Historic Districts Council, which championed the plan primarily driven by the Park Slope Civic Council. “We look forward to the rest of Park Slope being protected.”

The new district will add around 300 building — primarily 19th-century row houses on the streets bounded by Flatbush Avenue and Union Street, between Fifth and Sixth Avenues — to the 2,575-odd edifices already protected under the neighborhood’s original 1973 historic district and a 2012 expansion.

The expanded borders will also annex several 20th-century high-rise apartment buildings at Grand Army Plaza West, which some locals argued are too tall and modern for the designation during the local community board’s vote on the proposal three years ago, though the panel approved it anyway.

The designation means building owners within the boundaries have get the city’s okay for any new construction and alterations to their facades, and any new buildings in the zone have to adhere to the local look-book.

The expansion isn’t a done deal yet — the City Planning Commission and City Council still have to give their okay, though both Councilmen Brad Lander (D–Park Slope) and Steve Levin (D–Brooklyn Heights) are long-time fans of the plan.

The preservationists say they will now turn their focus to lobbying for a third expansion — of a planned five — in the area between Union and Ninth streets.

Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

TOM from Brooklyn says:
Advocates are insatiable.
April 13, 2016, 3:48 pm
Charles from Bklyn says:
Landmarking neighborhoods is usually appropriate under the cicumstanes of historical preservation. HOWEVER, when the city continues to give developers unfettered rights to build outside neighborhood norms, tax abatements and public land transfers, the landlords in these landmarked areas get far less. Fairness is not being adhered to by our city government, and it stinks.
April 14, 2016, 10:03 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: