Sections

Shot through the art: Paintball vandal strikes Red Hook free-speech mural

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

It is a free-speech free-for-all.

The creators of a Red Hook mural championing free speech are taking the artwork down because someone keeps taking their First Amendment rights too far by vandalizing the piece with a paintball gun.

Last month, a South African artist painted the four-story mural at Columbia and Woodhull streets depicting a woman in hijab with no mouth to highlight Iran’s suppression of free speech. But vandals keep blasting the artwork with red paint, so the artist and the advocacy group that commissioned the piece say they’re removing it out of respect for the neighborhood’s Muslim residents.

“If an Islamic person who lives in the neighborhood walks past that wall and sees the image splattered by a red paint gun, essentially it’s a message of war, death, intolerance,” said artist Faith47, who declined to give her birth name. “It’s an awful message, an extremely alienating and aggressive thing to see. I hate for my work to have any part in that, and therefore, fully support the removal of the work.”

The mural is part of a larger public art campaign by the organization Not A Crime, which aims to highlight Iran’s persecution of journalists and members of the Baha’i religious minority.

Faith47 painted the piece on Aug. 18 and 19, and the vandal first defaced her work sometime before Aug. 21, a representative from the group said.

“As soon as we put it up on the wall, we found that somebody was shooting paint balls at it,” said Not A Crime organizer Saleem Vaillancourt.

No one called the police until a second smearing on Sept. 5, said local authorities, who are still searching for the rogue paintball-gun-slinger.

It is not the first time a paintball sniper has splattered symbols of faith in Brooklyn — one or more scofflaws went on a paint-pellet shooting spree in the Orthodox Jewish section of Williamsburg earlier this year.

Vaillancourt isn’t sure whether the shooting is political, but he doesn’t think it is motivated by anti-Muslim sentiment.

“My personal feeling is that it’s not that malicious — it’s more just stupid,” said Vaillancourt, who added that several neighborhood residents have contacted him to express their dismay over the vandalism.

But regardless, the shooter is still undercutting free speech, the artist said — driving home the very point she was trying to paint.

“We’re seeing the correlation of the aggressive censorship of a totalitarian state, and the hateful censorship of an individual,” Faith47 said. “This is not a problem faced only in Iran — this is a deep, human psychological crisis.”

And even if the vandal was trying to make a serious statement via defacement, it is unlikely a judge would rule the paint slugs as speech protected under the First Amendment, according to a lawyer.

“The violation of the laws are clear — it’s criminal mischief, it’s damage of property,” said Ken Womble, an attorney with Downtown law firm Moore Zeman Womble. “If caught, that person or their attorney can try to raise a First Amendment defense all they want, and that will get them exactly nowhere.

Reach reporter Max Jaeger at mjaeger@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–8303. Follow him on Twitter @JustTheMax.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Charles Martel from EU says:
If an Islamic person who lives in the neighborhood walks past that wall and sees the image splattered by a red paint gun, essentially it’s a message of war, death, intolerance,” said artist Faith47,

No - if an islamic person sees that they will see an image of a living being - Haram.
Sept. 15, 2015, 11:38 am
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
"they’re removing it out of respect for the neighborhood’s Muslim residents."

So now we are censoring art (be it defaced or not) because of hypothetical outrage that someone's magical sky-daddy is not going to be happy with something? Do they take their knee-pads off at night or are they surgically implanted so they can suck off the religious outrage machine 24/7?
Sept. 15, 2015, 2:52 pm
John Wasserman from Prospect Heights says:
You make an interesting point, Jim. Unfortunately, it's not that interesting.
John Wasserman
Sept. 15, 2015, 5:45 pm
Farrow from NJ says:
It does feel wonderful to let one's hair blow in the wind.
Sept. 16, 2015, 10:11 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: