Sections

Ceasefire: Cobble Hill Association elects new board after leadership spat

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

They’re cobbling together.

A Cobble Hill civic association elected a new leadership team on Thursday following the resignation of its much-maligned chief last week, and the new honchos promised to bring members the transparent, democratic governance many complained was missing from the previous regime.

“We want to be more inclusive, period, end of discussion,” said Cobble Hill Association second vice president Daniel Arbeeny, one of only two incumbent candidates in the race.

Arbeeny and now-president Laurel Burr assembled a slate of fellow candidates for the seven positions on the group’s board after long-time leader Roy Sloane stepped down from his post last Tuesday.

The posse ran unopposed and was elected in an almost unanimous vote at Thursday’s meeting — with dozens of yeas overruling four nays.

Arbeeny, who runs an executive recruitment firm, and Burr, who formerly worked in the publishing industry, are joined on the new board by investment banker Adrian “Buzz” Doherty, merchant banker Ezana Bocresion, architecture firm manager Amy Breedlove, architect Laurie Maurer, and Kathryn Yatrakis — who is the dean of academic affairs at Columbia College.

All but two of the new board members are part of a bloc of two-dozen malcontents who last month announced their plan to vote Sloane from office for what they claimed was insular and ineffective leadership in the group’s fight against a widely hated housing development planned for the former Long Island College Hospital site.

The spat generated a lot of media attention for the small group and Sloane said he ultimately resigned to avoid more bad press and infighting.

But the new leaders studiously avoided mentioning the public squabble that led to Thursday’s meeting — Arbeeny put the vote down to a board vacancy and a “governance issue” — which rankled some members.

“Now you want to be sensitive? After the nasty things that you’ve said in the press?” said member Joanne Nichols to the group. “If you’re going to start being transparent, let’s start by being honest with that.”

The incoming skippers will now take over the group’s negotiations with Fortis Property Group, the developer that is purchasing the old hospital site and plans to erect glass towers of up to 40-stories in its place — which residents fear will tower over their historic brownstone ’hood and has been the association’s sole focus in recent years.

The newcomers said that while Sloane had done most of the bargaining on his own and was attempting to convince Fortis to build something smaller and less shiny out of respect to the neighborhood’s aesthetic, they will band together and appeal to the developer’s pocketbook.

They plan to find out exactly how much cash Fortis expects to make on its investment, then use their collective architectural and financial expertise to hash out a design that will generate the same revenue for the developer while adhering to the local lookbook, said one of the rookie rulers.

“What was lacking before was the analytical rigor,” said Bocresion, the group’s new treasurer. “An economic animal is not going to give a damn about our views on contextual architecture — he cares about his return.”

But some members are skeptical that a humble civic group — which couldn’t even stop singer and Cobble Hillian Norah Jones from putting historically inaccurate windows in her 19th-century rowhouse — could ever hold that much sway.

“To be perfectly honest, I think we’re f-----,” said one member who did not want to be identified. “My fear is that Fortis is going to do whatever it wants to do, and the city is going to let it happen.”

Reach reporter Harry MacCormack at hmaccormack@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–2511. Follow him on Twitter @HMacBKPaper.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Ray Davies from Waterloo says:
Diminutive by sunset the rendering says, black silhouette perspective not shown. You need Renzo Piano to work his veiled NYTimes magic. A lookbook isn't going to make this monster any less monstrous.
Sept. 14, 2015, 1:10 pm
John Wasserman from Prospect Heights says:
I just don't see this working. YET. We shall see.
John Wasserman
Sept. 14, 2015, 1:31 pm
Joe from Brooklyn Heights says:
It is a ridiculous premise - that this bunch of richie- richs will tell Fortis how much they should make from the deal? LOL.
Sept. 15, 2015, 5:18 pm
Ruth G. from Cobble Hill says:
Bunch of yahoos - got that right. Not one of the mob actually did anything for Cobble Hill. Ever. Nadda. Niente. Nil. Nein. And with no land use creds they are going to study the money Fortis will make? And then tell Fortis what they should make? You gotta be kidding! Yahoos ran their most experienced voices out of town. What fools.
Sept. 16, 2015, 4:12 pm
So from Carroll Gardens says:
So, I thought the purpose of this overthrow was so that the Cobble Hill Association could retain an attorney. That makes a certain kind of sense. Do they really think that they are the first group of people with "expertise" to try and negotiate with developers? It hasn't worked in the past.
Sept. 16, 2015, 10:46 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: