Donovan ducks Bay Ridge debate

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The only mark they’ll put next to his name is “absent.”

The Republican candidate in a special election to replace disgraced former Rep. Michael Grimm lost votes by ducking a debate in Bay Ridge on April 22, voters said.

“Him not showing up switched my vote,” said Laura Grassi of Bay Ridge. “I would have voted Republican had I heard what he had to say. He did not give me the respect of hearing his position. He made a big mistake not showing up here — what are we, garbage?”

The candidates who did show up spent much of the 90-minute debate slamming Staten Island District Attorney Dan Donovan for his absence from the debate, which was organized by the Bay Ridge Council on Aging and held at the Ft. Hamilton Senior Center.

“The first thing that sets me apart [from Donovan] is that I show up,” said Councilman Vincent “Vinnie” Gentile (D–Bay Ridge). “This is the most anti-democratic behavior in a campaign that I have seen. It is disrespectful and disgraceful.”

Gentile, Green Party candidate James Lane, and write-in hopeful Tom Weiss stumped to seniors during the forum, agreeing on several points, including their estimations of the Republican front-runner.

“Call him ‘despicable Dan Donovan’ for not attending these forums,” said Green Party candidate James Lane.

Even the moderators bashed the Republican hopeful when one resident posed a question for the absent attorney.

“We have the Dan Donovan chair,” said Peter Killen, gesturing to an empty seat at the dais. “The committee reached out many times to Dan Donovan and all I got from his people is ‘He’s busy, he can’t make it.’ ”

Weiss, who was not slated to speak, slipped into the vacant chair meant for Donovan and took the opportunity to voice his unwavering support for liberating Tibet from Chinese control.

Donovan didn’t show at a Bensonhurst forum on April 19 either, but a Donovan spokeswoman called criticisms of the attorney’s absence “silly.”

“We have now entered the silly season of a desperate campaign when our opponent is upset we didn’t attend his donor’s event,” said Donovan spokeswoman Jessica Proud. “Voters already got the message loud and clear from the last two debates that Mr. Gentile plans to raise taxes and take the DeBlasio agenda to Washington. Why he wants to continue talking about that is beyond us.”

On Wednesday, Gentile and Lane took turns hammering Donovan for congressional Republicans’ plan to cut Social Security and Medicare, which mainly benefit seniors.

Gentile and Lane both support taxing people who earn more than $118,500 — currently they pay no additional Social Security taxes. The move would replenish the program’s trust fund and “save Social Security for generations to come,” Gentile said.

Donovan has not endorsed a specific plan for preserving Social Security but has said that any changes made should not affect current recipients.

One resident who came to ask Donovan to make his plan more explicit felt slighted he didn’t get an answer — or even the chance to ask the question.

“It’s an insult he didn’t show up,” said Ridgite Ray Pucci, a retired detective.

The special election is May 5.

Reach reporter Max Jaeger at or by calling (718) 260–8303. Follow him on Twitter @JustTheMax.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Ray from The Ridge says:
Recchia also missed debates.
Is this a strategy for empty suits?
April 23, 2015, 12:30 am
Michael from Bay Ridge says:
He couldn't make it due to a prior engagement at the circus, where he's the lead clown.
April 23, 2015, 6:42 am
Ferkin Derya from ALA says:
Social Security TRUST FUND? What a liar.
April 23, 2015, 6:58 am
Big polar from Bay Ridge says:
For a guy who didn't show up to a debate seems like Donovan got an awful lot of press. Just saying.
April 23, 2015, 9:37 am
Republican from Dyker Heights from Dyker Heights says:
If Donovan is petrified of Vincent Gentile, what is he going to do when he has to tangle with powerful politicians who want to pass stuff bad for New York? At least Gentile is a moderate who we know will fight.
April 23, 2015, 9:48 am
Franco says:
Vinnie embarrassed Dan Donovan on live television when he asked Dan what the current minimum wage was and he couldn't answer. If I were Dan Donovan I'd be ducking debates, too.
April 23, 2015, 10:46 am
Peter Engel from downtown Brooklyn says:
The problem is that so many Archie Bunker types citing "law & order" think that Donovan's the cat's meow. He doesn't have to say anything. He may win.
April 23, 2015, 11:54 am
Luis from Sunset Park says:
Does any of this matter?

Gentile is going to get creamed by Donovan.
April 23, 2015, 5:42 pm
Jaegermeister from Bay Ridge says:
Is Donovan's team keeping him under wraps so he doesn't say anything stupid during another debate?
April 23, 2015, 6:52 pm
Jimmy from Flatbush says:
Gentile and Donovan.... these are the best Staten Island and SW Brooklyn could come up with? Jesus give us strength.
April 23, 2015, 7:30 pm
Middle of the Road from Bay Ridge says:
These Donovan guys are so smug about the Brooklyn candidate versus our guy from Staten Island, I hope Donovan gets creamed.
April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
John from Bay Ridge says:
I really don't like Donovan and hate the fact that Bay Ridge is part of a congressional district dominated by SI. But can anyone credibly say that Vinnie would be an effective congressman? After observing his 12 run of "representing" Bay Ridge I have to say that he is one of the least effect government representatives I have ever seen. In all of his years in office Vinnie has accomplished absolutely nothing of importance. Vinnie is a guy looking for an easy paycheck.
April 24, 2015, 8:43 am
John from Bay Ridge says:
Jimmy from Flatbush's post really says it all.
April 24, 2015, 8:44 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: