Sections

Bay Ridge and Dyker Heights’s Community Board 10 backs new liquor license for karaoke danger zone Crown KTV

Crown-22! Booze permit renewal puts Ridge board between rock and hard place

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

A Bay Ridge panel wants a local karaoke spot to start singing a new tune.

Community Board 10 voted to support the renewal of crime-plagued Dyker Heights karaoke joint Crown KTV’s liquor license on Jan. 27 — but only with a litany of stipulations — because the neighborhood panel’s members feared that if they voted against it, the State Liquor Authority would simply rubber-stamp the druggy, stabby sing-a-long spot’s application with no conditions at all.

“We were worried that they’d go to the SLA and the SLA would just approve them,” said Sandy Vallas, a member of the board’s Police and Public Safety Committee. “We thought we might as well have stipulatio­ns.”

The liquor authority is obligated to write the board’s requests into the 64th Street nightspot’s new license — and CB10 put in a long list of demands, including certified security guards, surveillance cameras, heavy-duty soundproofing, a ban on promoters renting out the club, strict hours of operation, a 21-and-up-only entrance policy, and regular meetings with the panel.

The terms of the license are intended to combat the ongoing problems at Crown, where in 2011 a man stabbed five people in a brawl, and in 2010 police witnessed a man doing cocaine off the bar.

The board reported that neighbors continue to complain about noise levels, underage drinking, and drug dealing at the lounge, as well as party-goers exiting the establishment at 7 and 8 am. This is of special concern to the community because PS 69 is just around the corner on 63rd Street.

“We’re worried about some of the possible influences on the children,” said the school’s principal Jaynemarie Capetanakis, a member of CB10.

Crown was the subject of 50 calls to 911 and eight arrests in 2013 — two of them on felony charges — but the liquor authority’s files show no violations occurring since 2011. Neither the police nor the state agency could explain the discrepancy.

In 2012, the authority slapped Crown KTV with $37,000 in fines for an incident of underage drinking and drug use from years earlier, but stopped short of revoking the hangout’s license — which CB10 had requested.

The State Liquor Authority only looks at its own files when deciding whether to revoke an establishm­ent’s license. And the revocation process is totally separate from the renewal process, which a state spokesman said usually results in an automatic approval so long as the bar completes the necessary paperwork and submits it on time.

Some dissenters on the board doubted the effectiveness of any stipulations, given Crown’s reputation as a scofflaw establishment, and wanted to vote against renewal — and pressure local leaders to close the lounge.

“They never obey any stipulations, why are they going to obey this? They’re not even going to read it,” argued board member Joseph Sokoloski. “Why can’t our public officials get involved and have the place padlocked?”

A spokesperson for Councilman Carlos Menchaca (D–Sunset Park) — whose district covers troublesome nightspot — promised to bring the situation to the attention of the newly-elected pol.

No representative for Crown KTV attended the meeting, and repeated calls to the bar went unanswered.

A 2011 charge against the bar for controlled-substance use is still pending a hearing at the State Liquor Authority.

Reach reporter Will Bredderman at wbredderman@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4507. Follow him at twitter.com/WillBredderman.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

formerly on the job says:
"Crown was the subject of 50 calls to 991 and eight arrests in 2013 — two of them on felony charges — but the liquor authority’s files show no violations occurring since 2011. Neither the police nor the state agency could explain the discrepancy."

There is a simple explanation: the local precinct isn't filing the required paperwork with the SLA. The special ops lieutenant either doesn't know how to do his or her job, or doesn't care.
Jan. 31, 2014, 10:47 am
The Chooch from The Bohemian Magic Show says:
This is outrageous! People doing coke and stabbing each other in a bar in Brooklyn? Whoever heard of such a thing! Hey, I got an idea, how about an artisanal brewery and salad bar in that place. Abbrakazaam baby!
Jan. 31, 2014, 11:10 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: