Sections

Candidates square off in ‘Great Debate’

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

It was a war of words.

The Bay Ridge Community Council held its annual “Great Bay Ridge Debate” on Sept. 23, bringing together candidates for state and federal offices serving Bay Ridge. But one hopeful never made it to the stage. In a last-minute snub to his home district, Democratic challenger Domenic Recchia did not show up to debate Rep. Michael Grimm (R–Bay Ridge). The incumbent congressman blasted his opponent, saying the former councilman had not done the most basic homework before running and was not ready for the limelight.

“In the last week, my opponent has made several gaffes,” Grimm said. “What they realized is that he can’t be in front of the cameras.”

Recchia’s camp would not comment on why the candidate ducked the debate and instead attacked Grimm, who has pleaded not guilty to a 20-count indictment alleging tax, mail, and immigration fraud related to a business he owned before assuming office.

One leader of the Bay Ridge civic group said the congressional hopeful’s staff cited a scheduling conflict — though invitations went out last month.

“His handlers are telling us he is busy, but they aren’t saying why,” said Ted General, a member of the group’s board of directors.

A recent NY1 poll shows that Recchia has come within four points of his embattled rival.

With Recchia a no-show, Grimm used his time to smear his opponent as a cog in the Democratic machine.

“If you don’t think we’re on the wrong track, if you think President Obama and Mayor DeBlasio have this city and this country on the right track, then my opponent is your guy, because he will be lockstep with Mayor DeBlasio and the president,” Grimm said.

The contest between Assemblyman Alec Brook-Krasny (D–Coney Island) and Republican Stamatis Lilikakis also heated up Tuesday night, with the challenger attacking Brook-Krasny’s record on tax hikes, and the Coney Island assemblyman exposing his opponent’s political naivete.

Lilikakis, a political newcomer, attacked Brook-Krasny’s record on education, charging that the four-term incumbent voted against a 2013 bill establishing a college scholarship program. But Brook-Krasny pointed out that he never got a chance to vote on the bill, because it never cleared the assembly’s higher education committee, of which Brook-Krasny is not a member. The incumbent took Lilikakis’s gaffe as an opening and pounced on the business owner’s own voting record.

“I know that in the last 20 years, you’ve only voted twice, and that was in presidential elections,” Brook-Krasny said.

Lilikakis conceded the point.

“As far as my voting record, you’re right, and I apologize,” he said. “As far as that’s concerned, I had my reasons.”

The next Bay Ridge debate is Oct. 1.

Bay Ridge Council on Aging Candidates Forum at Fort Hamilton Senior Center [ 941 Fort Hamilton Pkwy. between 99th and 100th streets in Bay Ridge, (718) 619–5110] Oct. 1 at 9 am.

Reach reporter Max Jaeger at mjaeger@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260–8303. Follow him on Twitter @JustTheMax.
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

So Embarrassing to be... from Bay Ridge! says:
Maybe Recchia did have another commitment, or maybe he just didn't see the point of this debate and whether he'd be walking into a lynching. This is one of Marty Golden's toys, and his opponent is famous for his extreme threats, and lack of brains. (Really? Threatening to throw a reporter off the 3rd floor balcony of the U.S. Capitol Building...on live television????)

Whatever. BTW, Council, update your webpage "About Us" Links: Markowitz is gone, Hynes is gone, new Police Captain...or are you just living in the past?
Sept. 25, 2014, 9:36 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: