Vision Zero comes to Greenpoint with Slow Zone for McGuinness

City to lower McGuinness speed limit to 25

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A mile-long stretch of McGuinness Boulevard in Greenpoint will get the car-pinching treatment from the city, pols announced on Tuesday.

The city will lower the speed limit on the fast-moving thoroughfare that leads up to the Pulaski Bridge to 25 miles per hour and rejigger its traffic signals in an effort to avoid more deaths like the four the road has seen since 2008. A local activist hailed the move.

“I think it will help prevent deaths and any steps we can take to slow traffic is progress,” said John Beadle, a member of the Kings County Democratic Committee.

The official Slow Zone will start at Freeman Street at the base of the Pulaski Bridge and extend all the way to Bayard Street, just short of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway. The city will also reset the timing of all of the stoplights along that stretch of road to force drivers to get into lower gears.

Politicians made the announcement at the intersection of McGuinness and Nassau Avenue, where a woman was killed by a motorist in December as she tried to cross the fast-paced road. Two other pedestrians and a cyclist have also been killed on that stretch of pavement during the past six years.

Assemblyman Joe Lentol said that Mayor DeBlasio’s Vision Zero plan to reduce traffic deaths to zilch during the next decade is music to his ears after years of calling to squeeze drivers to no avail.

“I have been advocating for traffic calming measures along McGuinness Boulevard for quite some time now, with little success,” said Assemblyman Joe Lentol (D–Greenpoint). “This is the first indication that Vision Zero is making its way into Greenpoint. I applaud DOT Commissioner [Polly] Trottenberg and Mayor DeBlasio’s approach to improving the safety of motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists through Vision Zero and I hope that this is only the beginning.”

The street is the second in Brooklyn tapped for a major slowdown in the past two weeks after Atlantic Avenue, which is being designated a 25-miles-per-hour road along its entire eight miles in the borough.

The city will begin installing new signs on May 12 and has vowed to finish by the end of May.

Reach reporter Danielle Furfaro at or by calling (718) 260-2511. Follow her at
Updated 10:17 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

diehipster from Stomping Soyboys says:
LOL this I gotta see. Traffic nightmare. In the meantime, is it possible to get the craft ale drunk ipod listening beardo bicyclists and pedestrians off the road?
April 22, 2014, 2:19 pm
ty from pps says:
Glad the ignorant one could chime in... traffic nightmare eh? I'd love to hear how a *slightly* slower speed limit will cause a "nightmare." I'm sure your understanding of traffic movement is as enlightened as Mr. Tal "Traffic is Like Water in a Channel" Barzilai.
April 22, 2014, 2:24 pm
ty from pps says:
By the way, I think the majority of Brooklyn would appreciate it if you could stay "below the line" where you think you belong (though, most of your neighbors would probably wish you would just move to New Jersey or Staten Island already).
April 22, 2014, 2:25 pm
bkmanhatposeur from nubrooklyn says:
man. They need speed bumps and traffic cameras. Those truckers don't really care for cyclist or pedestrians.
April 22, 2014, 3:04 pm
Northside Ned from Greenpoint says:
Another progressive step. Eventually they'll just turn that stretch of McGuinness into a green space. Why is it even that way in the first place? Who thought it was a good idea to put a major thruway smack in the middle of a pedestrian heavy neighborhood? Maybe the mooks of yesteryear abstained from walking? That would make sense. Half of the leftovers look like they are going to have a cardiac episode if their shoelace comes untied.
April 22, 2014, 3:07 pm
diehipster from Stomping Soyboys says:
We will not hold accountable the clueless out of state wanna be urban don't walk sign running ipod listening drunk hipsters. They are INNOCENT - INNOCENT I SAY. It's the drivers fault who had the green - always.

Ohioooooooooooooooo strong!
April 22, 2014, 3:09 pm
John Wasserman from Prospect Heights says:
↑↑↑↑↑Someone needs to catch a "meeting" = Grindr hook up↑↑↑↑↑
Pardon me.
April 22, 2014, 3:28 pm
Mike from Williamsburg says:
I think the lower speed limit will do very little and the retimed traffic lights will do a lot more. Taking a lane of traffic off the bridge will also help a lot.
April 22, 2014, 3:33 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Lowering the speed limit is nothing more than a PR purpose. As long as there is no enforcement on the current speed limits and you still have pedestrians and cyclists flouting the laws themselves, the streets will never be safe. I do feel that retimed traffic lights will work, but the anti-car fanatics will never accept this, because it will make sense and not result in inconveniencing motorists, which is what they support over at places such as Streetsblog and Transportation Alternatives. In reality, slow zones only give the theory of giving safety, but not the practice of it.
April 22, 2014, 5:30 pm
diehipster from Crushing Calebs says:
Here is there inevitable truth: you can lower the speed from 35 to 25 to 20 to 10 to 1; the brand new "urban" hip/yup crowd will keep on nasally honking until they get their way just like they got it in culdescaia as kids. Meanwhile us normal NYers dealt with whatever was thrown at us for 300 years.

The power of diehipster compels you.

It feels good to be a real man.
April 22, 2014, 6 pm
Sid from Boerum Hill says:
There are numerous studies that show that a pedestrian hit at 25 has a better chance of surviving an accident that at 40. Lowering the speed limit from 30(city wide or even 35 if it was posted as such) to 25 won't by itself lower speeds. Changing the lights might but also may cause a lot of rear end accidents. It may also cause truck traffic to go to parallel residential streets where the traffic is lighter. People drive the speed they feel comfortable at. Sometimes its more than the limit anyway. Normally speed limits are set based on what the traffic is doing(some set percentage of the drivers).What the City will want to do is to also do enforcement and eventually put in speed cameras. Enforcement will bring speed down if its a place where people speed. Normally most speed cameras are not set at the actually limit but about 5 miles above it. You still want traffic and goods to move. Trucks are the way the city gets feed and you get things delivered. You don't want trucks speeding on narrow residential streets because the arterial roads are blocked by traffic. So there is no misunderstanding I support lowering the limits to 25. Removing too many lanes will force the trucks elsewhere.
April 22, 2014, 7:34 pm
Dot from Daasssshhhh says:
Horray for Bolshivik Bill!
April 22, 2014, 8:16 pm
jay from nyc says:
thanks bp for removing my post (not!)
April 22, 2014, 8:17 pm
Rufus Leaking from Bh says:
It's not about speed, it's not about safety, it's about revenue, but thanks for playing!
April 22, 2014, 10:02 pm
ty from pps says:
oh... more of the chorus of the ignoramuses. (You know who I'm referring to...)
April 22, 2014, 10:45 pm
John from Sunset Park says:
Why is the city concerned with speeding?

With the amount of traffic jammed up on the streets I can barely get to 25 mph
April 22, 2014, 11:51 pm
The Chooch from The Bohemian Magic Show says:
A move in the right direction. Next step is to get cars off the boulevard altogether, and turn it into a greenway - bikes and pedestrians only. Fazoom! When we're done with Brooklyn, you won't recognize it.
April 23, 2014, 12:15 am
JAZ from Hunting Redbeards says:
Yeah, removing vehicle traffic altogether from McGuinness - great idea Chooch. Maybe we can turn the blvd into penny farthing and longboard traffic only. Then close down the Key Food and turn the space over to Caleb's Ye Olde Tyme Brooklyn Rooftop Kale and Cruelty Free Cacao Shoppe. Little Lorimer and Wythe can play Duck Duck Brooklyn in your endless greenspace while Penelope ArtSupply can get another cupcake tattoo on her formidable left ankle at 2pm on a weekday.

Niew Breukelein - like yahhhh deeed
April 23, 2014, 9:47 am
Laugher from NYC says:
Whatever... Vision Zero is a PR stunt, a buzzword pols like to spit out to appeal to the timid transplants.

Maybe next they should put up "No Racism" signs on every corner, and we'll all magically live in peace and harmony forever!
April 23, 2014, 10:03 am
diehipster from Clotheslining Coltons says:
LOL - what a fantasy world these intruders live in. Never been told "no" back in Culdesacia; most have all expense paid playcations to NY and even property bought for them.

Then they nasally shriek to change laws because they can't even cross a Brooklyn street properly. This kind of nasal shrieking is no different than when they were 4 years old and having temper tantrums to convince mommy that they wanted to draw on the walls or wanted another Rice Krispy Treat and got their way.

They'll never be real Brooklynites and it kills them when we inform them of this. Hey hipsters, here's a little jingle they taught us years ago when you were still drinking Sunny-D in your Wisconsin tree houses - "Cross on the green, not in between."

And here's a PSA for you fragile kidults:

Hi Ho Vision Beardo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 23, 2014, 11:28 am
ty from pps says:
"most have all expense paid playcations to NY and even property bought for them"

I still wonder where all of this magical money comes from to support *most* of the people that move here from out of state... What a warped sense of the national economy diehipster has. Not surprising since everything he writes is falls somewhere between ignorant and stupid.

The jealousy he oozes for the fantasy he's created is remarkable. What a sad little man.
April 23, 2014, 1:02 pm
The Wizard Of Williamsburg from Apartment formerly occupied by Latino family says:

Die Hipster did not create the fantasy. The fantasy created him.

Author Unknown
April 23, 2014, 1:07 pm
diehipster from Trouncin' Tristans says:
Bike Lane Problem Solved. Just make your own and stop bothering normal people and wasting time, money and space:
April 23, 2014, 2:29 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Honestly, I don't see how slow zones are really going to solve anything as long as you still have other groups still flouting the laws and the current limit not being enforced. In reality, this is just going to create more traffic where there wasn't originally. Also, doing it on major thoroughfares is a bad idea, because it's used a lot by commercial vehicles, and that will make them even slower than they already are, plus this can cause traffic to be taken into side streets making them go from bad to worse with traffic, and I know many don't want that. For the record, I don't condone reckless drivers, but I hardly hear any responsible cyclists calling out the rogue cyclists when they feel that they don't represent them. Again, this is more of a PR stunt and just something that only looks good in theory but not in practice.
April 23, 2014, 3:20 pm
Trans Alt from My Bike says:
A good start would be banning private vehicles in Williamsburg and Greenpoint from the BQE to the river.
April 23, 2014, 4:14 pm
Johnny from Greenpoint says:
Diehipster is that old crusty —— that just can't get with the program. Tal B is like an autistic kid repeating what he heard from daddy.

Safer streets in Brooklyn is a good thing you ——in idiots. This is a city not a through-way for suburbanites.
April 23, 2014, 4:36 pm
Matt from Greenpoint says:
There is a speed limit on McGuinness?
April 23, 2014, 10 pm
Matt from Greenpoint says:
Don't mind me. I'm just jealous my parents did not buy me a half million dollar apartment overlooking scenic McGuinness Blvd.
April 23, 2014, 10:08 pm
Matt from Greenpoint says:
"What's that, you say you bought it yourself?" laughing even harder now.
April 23, 2014, 10:09 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
Johnny, how about discussing the actual issue rather than attacking the person, which I tend to find a very cowardly act and a hit below the belt?
April 24, 2014, 7:38 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: