Sweet justice! Court rejects suit over Domino mortgage deal

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A court ruling will allow the cash-strapped developers behind the ailing Domino Sugar project to renegotiate with a lender — quashing a lawsuit by project co-owner Isaac Katan.

The appellate court’s decision last Friday affirmed a Manhattan Supreme Court judge’s ruling against Katan, nixing his request to halt Domino partner Community Preservation Corporation Resources from hammering out a new deal on its mortgage with its backer.

Community Preservation Corporation Resources saluted the court’s decision and promised to get financing and begin the long-stalled residential conversion of the Williamsburg plant, which calls for bringing 2,200 units of housing — 660 of them priced below market rate — to the sugar factory.

“Katan’s allegations had absolutely no merit so we are pleased that the judge agreed that Katan has no right to restrain us from making decisions on behalf of the project,” said Community Preservation vice president Susan Pollock, who filed a motion to dismiss Katan’s suit outright. “We will continue to make decisions for Domino’s future and remain committed to our vision for a vibrant, mixed-income, Williamsburg community.”

The city approved the controversial proposal to turn the massive Southside factory into apartments two years ago, but developers have not broken ground on the site and a rift grew between the owners when Community Preservation Corporation Resources defaulted on a $120-million loan and quietly put the property on sale.

Community Preservation Corporation sought to refinance its mortgage while maintaining a smaller stake in the property, but Katan filed suit and implored the court to consider his own secret “white knight” investor — a backer he claimed could save the debt-ridden Domino project last month.

Pollock told this newspaper in March that her company will continue looking for new investors with experience building affordable housing and developing waterfront properties. A Katan spokesman said he is mulling legal options and declined further comment.

Reach reporter Aaron Short at or by calling (718) 260-2547.
Updated 5:32 pm, July 9, 2018: Updated to provide more clarity on the legal elements.
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Paul from Sheepshead Bay says:
Why is that the majority of new development as negotiated for by this city, under this mayor, has to go to the well heeled 1 percent? Less than a third of it is below market rate. Another question to ask of that is what precisely is the amount going to be as defined by "below market rates"?
I'm also certain that all the good views of Manhattan will go to that well heeled population. Those tenants who can't afford those outrageous rents will be relegated to staring out at the back end of a rubbish tip.
May 7, 2012, 7:16 pm
VOT from 11249 says:
What is it that you have done that is so special, Paul, that the rest of New York should subsidize you and pay for you to get a luxury apartment on the water with Manhattan views that you can't afford?

No more "affordable housing" driving up the price of apartments for everyone else.
May 9, 2012, 10:01 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: