Jeffries-mandered! Hakeem could be cut from legislative district, again

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Congressional hopeful Hakeem Jeffries may find himself running without his political strongholds of Fort Greene and Clinton Hill thanks to gerrymandered district lines — like the ones that cut him out of his Assembly district a decade ago.

A federal judge drew new draft maps for each House district this week, removing the Fort Greene Assemblyman’s biggest supporters in central Brooklyn while adding a wide swath southern Brooklyn including Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Mill Basin, and Gerritsen Beach as well as Queens neighborhoods like Howard Beach to the sprawling district currently overseen by Rep. Ed Towns (D–Bedford-Stuyvesant).

Jeffries, who announced his intention to challenge Towns earlier this year, said that the preliminary maps gave him a “flashback to 2002” when state legislators drew a line around his house, forcing him to move in order to run for a state Assembly seat.

“It’s deja vu all over again — I survived that and I will survive this time around,” he said.

The new lines aren’t just bad news for the aspiring Congressman, they’re also unfair to Brooklyn voters, Jeffries told a supporters at a rally against the new maps outside federal court on Thursday.

“I’m no demographer but I do think Howard Beach does not have anything in common with Bedford-Stuyvesant,” he said.

State legislators must draw new lines for their own districts and for Congress once every 10 years following census counts. But the process has become so politically tinged in recent decades that federal court judges must step in and redraw the lines themselves.

This year, few public officials are happy.

Jeffries, fellow Congressional candidate Councilman Charles Barron (D–Canarsie), and half a dozen pols came together to rail against the federal judge’s proposed map on Thursday, a rare point of agreement among the political rivals.

“These [district lines] are an attack on Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, and we can’t allow that to happen,” said Barron. “We’re not looking for favors or handouts, we’re asking to demand our fair share of power.”

Both Jeffries and Barron vowed to continue campaigning for Congress despite the new maps and said they believe Judge Roanne Mann would return Fort Greene and Clinton Hill to the central Brooklyn district before the maps become the law of the land.

Jeffries invited Towns to the event, but he did not attend and declined to comment. Rep. Yvette Clarke (D–Park Slope), who would inherit Fort Greene and Clinton Hill, was in Washington and did not attend the rally.

Judge Mann will submit a final draft of the maps on Monday before a panel of three judges makes them official.

Reach reporter Aaron Short at or by calling (718) 260-2547.
Updated 5:30 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Joey from Clinton Hills says:
maybe they didn't even notice you were there? I mean, what have you accomplished?
March 9, 2012, 10:45 am
Oh, please from Carroll Gardens says:
We all knew we were going to lose two congressional seats and the new districts could change significantly. There is no legal requirement that a candidate reside in a district he or she is running in so if Jeffries were to win he has ample time to move. If Jeffries' base is now part of Clarke's proposed district then maybe he should consider a run against her. There are options. However, you don't get to select your voters.
March 9, 2012, 11:07 am
Moses from Park Slope says:
This story was very poorly written.

a) The bit about what happened to Jeffries 10 years ago is only relevant as an ironic kicker. It's not relevant to today's battle.

b) Jeffries "announced his intention to challenge Towns..." How about just "Jeffries challenged Towns..."

c) And a line like this — "the process has become so politically tinged in recent decades..." — is devoid of any real understanding of the history of gerrymandering in this nation, a time-honored practice dating back to the earliest days of the Republic. It is more sophisticated now, thanks to computers that can assess voting patterns on a building-by-building basis, but gerrymandering was much more brutal before the 1960s.

d) And the story fails to point out the most important point: the actual racial breakdowns of the current districts are roughly the same as the proposed districts — the ones that Jeffries says will disenfranchise blacks. How? Blacks will still be a majority of residents and can pick whomever they want. That's democracy. If you are going to quote Charles Barron being a nut, at least provide the reader with information so he can determine just how crazy he is.

And this is journalism?
March 9, 2012, 12:55 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: