Chalk it up! Bloomberg would lay off more than 1,000 Bklyn teachers

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Mayor Bloomberg is not hot for Brooklyn teachers.

The city’s doomsday budget scenario calls for 1,117 out of 19,007 teachers to be laid off — and Brooklyn accounts for close to 24 percent of the 4,675 proposed layoffs citywide.

And some schools would lose half of their teachers — the result, the mayor says, of a state school aid cut of $1.4 billion.

Principals took the proposed cuts personally.

“It [would be] very difficult to see them go,” said Cynthia Holton, principal at PS 107 on Eighth Avenue in Park Slope, which would lose six out of its 35 teachers, or 17 percent, under the mayor’s plan. “Not only do you feel personally committed to them, but layoffs will hurt the school system. We don’t want to increase class size.”

The city published a map over the weekend detailing the layoffs at each affected school in hopes that parents would join the fight to pressure state officials to change the “arbitrary standard” that makes it more difficult to fire teachers with seniority.

The state Senate made the change on Tuesday, but Assembly leaders said they would not take up the bill.

Because seniority rules remains in place, city officials said, the proposed cuts would disproportionately affect newer schools or buildings in high poverty areas, where teacher retention can be a challenge.

And the cuts will be deep at some schools, including the Brighter Choice Community School in Bedford-Stuyvesant, which would lose five of its eight teachers, or 63 percent of the total; and the Khalil Gibran International Academy — an Arabic culture school the city created — in Fort Greene that would lose 44 percent of its staff, or four of its nine teachers. School officials there refused to comment.

The threat of layoffs bedeviled parents and educators.

“Anything that creates layoffs is a bad thing,” said Jim Devor, a parent of a student at Middle School 51 on Fifth Avenue in Park Slope, which would only lose one teacher out of 60. “But it is unnecessary. There are other ways to balance a budget.”

Retired teacher Lewis Friedman agreed.

Friedman, who taught in Williamsburg and Parks Slope for 29 years, said he remembers the budget crisis of the 1970s, “when classes were so crowded kids had to sit on radiators.”

“It will be devastating for the school system,” he said. “They are destroying the school system at the expense of workers — they are cutting off their nose to spite their face.”

The city noted that the layoffs may never happen, and it is likely that new teachers would be hired at the schools, as the numbers do not reflect the number of teaching positions that would be eliminated, officials noted.

But parents said they were weary of the political gamesmanship.

“I’m concerned about the mayor’s propaganda that the newest teachers are the most enthusiastic teachers,” said Gloria Mattera, a political activist and parent at PS 321 on Seventh Avenue in Park Slope, which would lose eight of its 85 teachers, or nine percent. “It’s just a plot to diminish the collective bargaining power of unions, and it is a complete power grab. Any number of layoffs is too many to bear.”

Updated 5:23 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

StevenRosenberg from ParkSlope says:
Unfortunately merit and excellence will play no part in the layoffs; and I doubt 1000 will actually be cut.

Looking forward to the moronic local pols pulling a Wisconsin--BRING IT!
March 2, 2011, 10:54 am
al pankin from downtown says:
what takes so long for "due process" to work? we are spending a fortune of taxpayers money to keep teachers in the rubber room, students need teachers in the classroom...enough already, when will the teachers union stop protecting a bunch of folks who should be fired? put the union reps back in the classroom when they will do some good.
March 2, 2011, 12:30 pm
Sid from Boerum Hill says:
the reason it takes so long is a management problem not the Unions. I was management for the state same labor rules with hearings etc and all were done in 3 months or less....and I fired many Union employees. It takes good paper trails but it is NOT impossible. When I hear people say it is....lazy people IMO....
I also gave out as a percentage the highest unsatisfactory ratings by percent in the state at 3%. laying off first the Unsats and the previously disciplined will not make a large dent in the layoffs....
March 2, 2011, 5:26 pm
Lew Friedman from Park Slope says:
I was quoted in this article. I also discussed with Gary Buiso the fact that because I was a reformer in the schools and the union from '66 to '96, my principal was told by the school board in Williamsburg to fire me. Because of tenure, she couldn't without cause. In '75 when the budget cuts hit (mentioned in the article) I would have been eliminated for political reasons if it weren't for seniority. There IS a reason for tenure and seniority. It keeps the boss from making those decisions for the wrong reasons. Because of tenure and seniority, some amount of democracy can flourish in our school system.

As Sid from Boerum Hill noted above, there IS a process for getting rid of incompetent teachers, but there has to be a will by school administration to develop an accurate and fair case and there must be a strong procedure in place to protect unfairly accused or rated teachers.
March 3, 2011, 10:24 am
shermika brown from brooklyn says:
I am a student. age 17 and i feel that the mayor is a _____ for taking in an act of such that we all should say "low" Its a fact that he can't make a change. We can say that he's messing things up before a change. But sorry i think he needs to resign. I know alot of teens who are upset about this and we're going to fight this.
April 4, 2011, 12:06 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: