Dem ‘robo-calls’ target Bay Ridge Rep. Mike Grimm

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Rep. Michael Grimm’s support of the GOP’s controversial spending bill has left the Marine and former FBI agent with a big target on his back.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee began a “robo-call” campaign against Grimm (R–Bay Ridge) on Wednesday, vilifying the freshman legislator for cutting police funding “by 26 percent” when he voted for more than $60 billion in cuts to the nation’s $3.8-trillion budget.

“If Michael Grimm has his way, more cops will be out of a job and our streets will be less safe — threatening our communities,” states the automated call.

The national Democratic organization’s call highlighted what local liberals have been complaining about ever since Grimm defeated Democrat Mike McMahon in the majority Democratic Bay Ridge-Staten Island district: That Grimm would vote with his Republican brethren even at the expense of his constituents.

For example, in approving the overall GOP budget plan, Grimm endorsed many other cuts, including:

• Defunding President Obama’s landmark health care reforms by prohibiting any federal money to be spent on implementing it. Grimm promised to defund the health care reforms, which he called a “job killer.”

• Eliminating all federal funds for Planned Parenthood, which could shut down many of the group’s birth control, cancer screenings and HIV testing programs. Grimm is pro-life — but Planned Parenthood is already forbidden by federal law from spending any of its federal funds to provide abortions.

• Cutting $758 million in food assistance to low-income families.

• Removing $8.4 million from the Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Registry, which collects data on industrial emissions. Grimm has said that he doubts the science on whether such emissions contribute to global warming.

Grimm was the only federal lawmaker in the city to approve the cuts, which colleague Anthony Weiner (D–Sheepshead Bay) called wrong-headed.

“We all agree that we need to reduce the deficit, but we need to get our priorities straight,” Weiner said. “Some of these cuts are so Draconian they are never going to become law. That’s why we need to sit at the table and make a good compromise.”

The specific charges in the DCCC’s “robo-call” are a bit misleading. Grimm actually fought to restore more than half of the $498 million that the GOP leadership sought to cut from the Community Oriented Policing Services program, which helps municipalities hire police officers.

Grimm crossed party lines to buck Speaker John Boehner (R–Ohio), voting for an amendment sponsored by Weiner to restore $298 million to the program — taking the money out of NASA’s budget.

Grimm also voted to use Homeland Security funds to restore all of the grants the GOP sought to cut from fire companies throughout the nation, including the FDNY.

Grimm said that this brief dalliance with the Democrats was necessary to support “our city’s heroes.”

“While I fully support cutting the budget, we also need to strike balance when it comes to the safety and security of our nation’s citizens,” Grimm said in a statement. Attempts to get him on the phone continue to be unsuccessful.

Josh Schwerin, a spokesman for the DCCC, said that the robo-call isn’t about the $298 million Grimm helped save, but the $200 million that he and the GOP left on the cutting-room floor.

“Grimm agreed to cut half of that agency’s budget,” Schwerin said. “He could have put in an amendment to restore all the money, but he didn’t.”

There’s obviously a back story to the DCCC’s decision to target Grimm, whom the group sees as one of 50 “vulnerable House Republicans.”

“Rep. Michael Grimm has made himself vulnerable by making the wrong choices that demand middle class families sacrifice to cut spending while protecting taxpayer subsidies for Big Oil companies making record profits,” Schwerin said.

The goal of Democrats is to regain a seat that the party held for only two years in the last two decades — when McMahon succeeded scandal-tarred 12-year Rep. Vito Fossella, who declined to run for a likely re-election after he was arrested for drunk driving and later revealed that he had a second family in Virginia.

Grimm defeated McMahon by riding a tea kettle atop the anti-Democratic wave last November, getting 51.5 percent of the vote and defeating the DCCC’s “candidate protection program” that sent more cash and resources to McMahon’s campaign.

Weiner could see why the DCCC would use the congressional spending plan in their quest to unseat Grimm.

“[Approving these massive cuts] is pretty bad policy,” he said. “In some areas it’s also pretty bad politics.”

Updated 5:23 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Steven Rosenberg from Park Slope says:
Good to see the Democrat Reign of Irresponsibility is crumbling. Thank you, Rep Grimm! Now, if only our Governor was Scott Walker!
Feb. 24, 2011, 9:06 am
SusanT from Graves End says:
I don't see why the DCCC would even need to bother, this Grimm guy is a complete joke of a Conservative. He rode into Washington on the Tea Party dime in Molinaro's back pocket, and now he's advocating for spending increases, complaining that House ethics rules are "too restrictive", and ranting in Politico about how he needs a blender in his office for protein shakes? Protein Shakes! I'm sorry, Mr. Grimm, but don't you have some better things to worry about? Like how to pry your foot out of your mouth?

He's going down in 2012 anyway. Enjoy your time in Washington, Mr. Grimm. You won't get much more.
Feb. 24, 2011, 12:44 pm
joe from fort greene says:
your choice of words in the 1st paragraph ("a big target on his back") are inappropriate and bizarre considering what just transpired in Arizona. if rep. grimm is the victim of violence guess we'll know who shares the blame. also, what is your paper's fixation with him? kind of odd that out of all the brooklyn reps. you allot disproportionate amount of space to negative stories about him. thanks for the journalistic integrity.
Feb. 26, 2011, 6:14 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: