Sections

Judge to city: ‘Stay’ out of Broadway Triangle

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

The city’s bid to develop affordable housing in South Willamsburg stumbled this week, when a Manhattan judge refused to move forward on a lawsuit against the plan because the federal government is still investigating one of the city’s nonprofit development partners.

Judge Emily Goodman’s denial continues her stay on a lawsuit filed by opponents of the Broadway Triangle alleging that the city’s rezoning plan discriminated against black and Latino residents because it will result in large housing units to accommodate a growing Hasidic population at the expense of other impoverished communities.

The Bloomberg administration and two nonprofit development partners, the Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council and the United Jewish Organizations had hoped to begin construction of 1,851 units of housing on three city-owned lots near Throop Avenue late last year, after the City Council passed the rezoning in December, 2009.

But the lawsuit filed the day after the vote stalled those plans — and the case has been in court ever since.

But in the interim, two federal agencies and the state Attorney General launched investigations into Ridgewood Bushwick’s contracts and connections to its founder, Assemblyman Vito Lopez (D–Bushwick).

Citing those investigations, Goodman rejected the city’s motion to get the case moving already.

“The present litigation has been stayed by this court because the issues raised are simultaneously under investigation by the U.S. Attorney, which is also, it appears, investigating UJO’s co-developer, Ridgewood Bushwick.”

Some political insiders thought that Goodman’s Wednesday ruling was easily anticipated. After all, five days earlier, Mayor Bloomberg used his weekly radio address to criticize Goodman — by name — for several unrelated rulings, including a recent decision to prevent the city from laying off nine deputy sheriffs.

Goodman subsequently told the New York Law Journal that “attacks on judges … may have the effect on some pole of interfering with judicial independen­ce.”

Not that she mentioned that in her ruling this week, of course.

Updated 5:22 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Joey from Clinton Hills says:
here is the only fair formula for the distribution of affordable housing at this location:

1/3 hasidic; 1/3 puerto rican; 1/3 hipster families.
Jan. 28, 2011, 3:15 pm
Sam from Williamsburg says:
Can we stop with these Apartheid racial quotas.

These are equal fair housing, open for all. No splitting according to racial catagories. UJO have an excelent track record of allowing a fair chance for everybody. Schaefer Landing is a beutifule mosaic of cultures, and Hasidim r barely a quarter affordable units
Jan. 30, 2011, 2:16 pm
Sam from Williamsburg says:
A shame that this project is held hijacked cuz of a Judge's bias against the city and vendatta with the Mayore; Hasidic and hispanic groups who are destroying the area because of their jealousy on successes of venerable social services organizations.

ITS A SHAME
Jan. 30, 2011, 2:19 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: