Demise of LIRR tombstones is a victory for all!

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

We did it!

Roughly 18 months after this newspaper — OK, I — began a one-printing-press campaign against the Long Island Rail Road’s coffin-like security ring, the agency has changed tracks and ordered up the demolition of the hated granite sarcophagi.

This is good news for anyone who believes in freedom.

I’m not exaggerating. This newspaper’s crusade against these hideous barricades was not, as some railroad officials have whispered, just our excuse to use bigger headline fonts. Rather, it was a newspaper listening to its community.

From the moment that the LIRR cut the ribbon on the Atlantic Terminal, the building was one of the most heavily armored facilities in the borough — ringed by no less than 14 mammoth concrete coffins that give the beautiful new facility the look of an outpost in the Green Zone.

The appalling capitulation to the so-called “realities” of the so-called “post–9-11 world” turned architect John di Domenico’s inspirational portal into a bunker.

Train stations are supposed to be about magic and adventure, not paranoia and fear. They’re supposed to inspire Americans to explore and look beyond narrow parochialism, not encourage it.

Instead, we got a station that was a fortress. It wasn’t a landmark of civic design, but a line of civic defense, to paraphrase architectural critic Nicolai Ouroussoff.

Of course, you didn’t have to believe me, a man whose formal architectural training ended at Lego. Genuine architects came out of the wainscotting to slam what the LIRR did.

“Those coffins are unfortunate,” said designer Brendan Coburn. “[Other buildings] do this more sensitively using stone and stainless steel bollards.”

Fellow architect Hayes Slade said that di Domenico was obviously ordered back to the drawing board during construction because the bollards were so grotesquely out of step with the rest of the design.

“Our society is at an odd transitional moment regarding how we deal with considerations of potential terrorism versus safety, mobility, openness,” she said.

We may have been at a “transitional moment,” but it was one we created.

Certainly, no New Yorker needs to be reminded of the horrible damage done to our city by terrorists, but when we destroy our own civic institutions, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

And when our elected officials and the agencies they run choose to reject medievalism — whether in words, deeds or mere architecture — it’s a cause for celebration.

Gersh Kuntzman is the Editor of The Brooklyn Paper. E-mail Gersh at
Updated 5:26 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Brooklyn Ron from Ft Greene says:
I am thrilled to learn that the monster tombs will be replaced in front of the LIRR Atlantic terminal. I congratulate those who pursued the removal and won.

One for the good guys!!!!
Aug. 30, 2011, 11:54 pm
ch from bh says:
Your crusade? BP ran a couple articles 18 months ago and then
(except for the occasional article polishing Ratner's basketballs)
how is that a crusade?
Aug. 31, 2011, 8:20 am
Eric McClure from Park Slope says:
Gersh, while you're handing out credit (and you certainly deserve a fair amount, no doubt), let's not forget that had the sarcophagi story several weeks before everyone else -- including the Brooklyn Paper:
Aug. 31, 2011, 10:20 am
adamben from bedstuy says:
thanks god because it probably injured more people than any terrorist attack would.
Aug. 31, 2011, 11:01 am
Josef from Bklyn says:
A victory for freedom? Surely you jest.
I wasn't a big fan of the sarcophagi, but it is not worth whatever it will cost to replace them. The MTA will just tack it on to the next fare increase.
Aug. 31, 2011, 12:39 pm
quicke from prospect heights says:
I'm not sure how freedom has anything to do with the removal of these structures? Seriously... the things are annoying and most likely are being removed because of the increase volume of people who will be traveling into this station for the opening of Rat..ner's stadium. I highly doubt they are being removed because "freedom" was being restricted. Unless you mean freedom of pedestrian movement? Bruce most likely wanted them removed, considering he owns the building above the station.
Sept. 1, 2011, 11:14 am
angela from park slope says:
Thank God. congrats on any part BP played. Cheers to No Land Grab.

They got installed probably because someone's nephew runs a granite quarry business, surely.
Sept. 2, 2011, 11:58 am
DNK from Brooklyn says:
Kudos and good work. Those things were freakin' awful.
Sept. 2, 2011, 11:21 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: