City wins Prospect Park West bike lane suit

for The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The city has won the Prospect Park West bike lane case, as a judged tossed a lawsuit by opponents who claimed that the Department of Transportation improperly installed the controversial cycle path last year.

The suit was rejected on technical grounds, with the judge ruling that the suit was filed too late.

This is a breaking story, so for now, all we have is the city press release and the judge’s ruling. Click back later for the full story, but for now, here’s the “news” from the city perspective.



The Department of Transportation prevailed in the Prospect Park West bike path case late today, allowing the project — which was installed in response to community requests and concerns — to remain unimpeded after Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Bert Bunyan dismissed the main causes of action brought by the petitioners.

“This decision results in a hands-down victory for communities across the city. The plaintiffs have been dead wrong in their unsupported claims about the bike path and Department of Transporta­tion’s practices,” said Department of Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan. “This project was requested by the community, they voted repeatedly to support it, and their support has registered in several opinion polls. Merely not liking a change is no basis for a frivolous lawsuit to reverse it.”

“We are very pleased that the Court rejected the petitioners’ challenge. The bike path enhances the local community, helps mitigate speeding on Prospect Park West, and makes the road safer and more accessible venue for everyone,” said Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo of the Law Department, whose office litigated the case on behalf of Department of Transportation.

The city had argued that the installation was entirely proper and that the path was always represented as part of a permanent “street calming” project for Prospect Park West, a thoroughfare where cars often sped and bike riders rode on the sidewalk. The project was initiated after members of the community raised safety concerns. The proposal was revised multiple times with input from the community and was implemented after substantial analysis.

In its arguments, the city also asserted that the legal challenge was commenced too late, because the plaintiffs had exceeded their statute of limitations. The Court noted, “The threshold issue is whether petitioners’ bikeway claim is timely.” Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Bert Bunyan found it was untimely.

The plaintiffs argued that because the decision to install the bike lane was temporary, the time to challenge it had not begun when the lane was installed. The Court rejected that argument and found that in fact the decision to install the bike lane was meant to be permanent.

“We are gratified that the Court dismissed the main causes of action and found no evidence that the bike path was meant to be temporary. This important project can now remain unimpeded,” noted Senior Counsel Mark Muschenheim of the Law Department’s Administrative Law Division.

Updated 9:46 pm, August 16, 2011
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

ty from pps says:
I don't know how to spell the ungracious noises and hand gestures that I'm making right now... but hopefully Louise, Lois and the other folk can psychically receive the message -- well, if they've finally taken their heads out of each other's bums.
Aug. 16, 2011, 7:50 pm
ty from pps says:
Oh, and will the "real" story be written by Natalie O'Neill? Ya know, to make sure this decision sounds has negative as possible. Perhaps she can throw in some made up blurb about how Transportation Alternatives or Streetsblog kidnapped the judges children and held them for ransom.
Aug. 16, 2011, 7:58 pm
Gersh from Park Slope says:
Natalie O'Neill's story will be posted soon. It will be objective, credible and complete, as always.

The Brooklyn Paper
Aug. 16, 2011, 8:45 pm
ty from pps says:
I look forward to it :-)
Aug. 16, 2011, 8:55 pm
Gersh from Park Slope says:
Is that Gersh or Tal Barzilai? Because that's the funniest thing I've read all day. Natalie O'Neill has ZERO credibility. Her writing has been a huge disservice to this community on this issue and others.
Aug. 16, 2011, 11:28 pm
Edwin from Parl Slope says:
And who's side was this paper on, I can assure you that there will be a few politicians who will not be re elected.
Aug. 18, 2011, 1:55 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: