Sections

City to close ‘Norah’ loophole and require public hearing for alterations

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Call it the Norah Jones effect.

The city is planning to amend a rule that governs visible window openings on facades that don’t face the street — a change that may have averted the hubbub caused by the doe-eyed songstress’s designs for her Cobble Hill mansion.

In 2009, the Grammy Award-winning Bedford-Stuyvesant–born singer initially filed city paperwork for permission to perform some “minor” work on her Amity Street home, which is inside the Cobble Hill Historic District.

The work was approved after a public hearing. But then Jones’s architect filed amended paperwork that revealed the singer’s plan to punch 10 windows into the blank side of her home, causing a stir in the tony landmark district because its Greek Revival rowhouses traditionally eschew ostentation in favor of architectural discretion.

That amendment did not require a new public hearing. Hence, the talk of a “Norah Loophole.”

Eventually, Jones compromised to seven windows, but residents were still vexed that she was granted the right to cause window pains in the neighborhood without a new public hearing.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission took notice.

Jones’s application highlighted “a need for the Commission to set a limit on the number, size, pattern and placement of visible window openings on secondary facades,” commission spokeswoman Lisi de Bourbon said.

The law, as currently written, is ambiguous and does not require the commission’s oversight, provided the windows are in keeping with the existing aesthetic.

Like Jones’s smash hit, residents “don’t know why” it took so long — but were heartened by the city’s nascent effort nevertheless.

“We are trying to preserve the Cobble Hill Historic District and all other 19th-century rowhouses in the city so that they look the way they appeared in the early 19th century,” said Roy Sloane, president of the Cobble Hill Association, a civic group. “How can we preserve our landmarks when windows can be put in places where windows were never intended to go?”

But some preservationists want the city to do more to prevent another Windowgate.

The Historic Districts Council, a preservation group, said any alteration to a visible façade should get a full public hearing, because alterations can drastically change a building’s nature.

“Anything that happens on a secondary façade in a historically residential area should come before Landmarks so the community can weigh in,” said Simeon Bankoff, the group’s executive director.

The city has yet to finalize the rule change. And Jones declined to sing to us about her feelings.

Updated 5:23 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

JOey from Clinton Hills says:
Society Against Non-Original Windows!
April 8, 2011, 9:44 am
Mark from Upper East Side says:
All fine except it looks better with the windows. House walls are only blank because there used to be another house there. Corner houses have windows and this is now a 'corner' house.
April 8, 2011, 12:20 pm
al pankin from downtown says:
the house looks much better than a black brick wall, what are people complaing about?...they should mind their own historic business...if they wanted a blank brick wall they should have put up the money and bought the place.
April 8, 2011, 4:24 pm
Tony from CH says:
Yes exactly, it looks way better!

Wow incredible, a house with... windows on the side...
April 8, 2011, 5:40 pm
David from NYC says:
Rediculous Brooklyn idiots this group of complainers are. Snap out of it! Oh and way to go NYC ... heap more inane rules on to the pile. You people are a mess.
April 9, 2011, 8:17 am
Jacob Singer from Cobble Hill says:
19th Century is not Historic, it's just old! These buildings need to be modernized. What would have been historic is a Teepee, but no one is suggesting that we tear down the buildings and use Teepees instead! Or, are they?
April 10, 2011, 11:55 am
cathy from ca says:
So much for her humble "im like you" humble public persona. Money talks in the end, doesn't it? sigh.
April 10, 2011, 3:15 pm
Rob from Greenpoint says:
If you OWN the house, you should be able to make
minor renovations to it without a bunch of busybodies and yentas getting into the act !
April 11, 2011, 11:47 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: