What’s wrong with this sidewalk? She’d like to know

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A Park Slope woman says the city’s sidewalk inspectors are shaking her down for fast cash.

Josie Williams, who lives on Fifth Street between Prospect Park West and Eighth Avenue, was stunned last week to discover she is one of 27 homeowners who must pay for the installation of “distinctive sidewalks” that are more appropriate for historic districts in Park Slope, Brooklyn Heights and Carroll Gardens.

The sidewalks are also, according to Williams, completely unnecessary.

“It’s easy money for them,” said Williams. “I’ve lived here for 31 years and my sidewalk is fine.”

According to the Department of Transportation, Williams will have to pay roughly $2,000 to replace the eight “flags” (the technical term for each square of sidewalk) in front of her home.

“If the city is concerned about sidewalks, they’re starting with the wrong area,” said Williams, noting that even the most damaged flag on her property only had cracks, unlike many sidewalks around the city that have bulging, shoe-grabbing trip hazards often caused by aggressive tree roots.

But a Transportation spokeswoman said that a trip hazard had been reported on that block, triggering the sweep by sidewalk inspectors that led to six property owners having to pay for the new flags. The spokeswoman did not specify the location of the 311-reported sidewalk hazard.

And the city defended its installation plan, which calls for either historic bluestone or tinted concrete, depending on what type was in place originally.

But is Williams being shaken down or gussied up? Depends on whom you ask.

A contractor who installs sidewalks in the area said that Williams was getting a bargain by paying $9.48 per square foot of flag.

“I’d hire that contractor!” said the expert, John Notarnicola. “That’s not a bad deal! Sometimes when the city [installs sidewalks] in landmark districts, it can get as high as $12 per square foot.”

Community Board 6 has been calling for just such a program for years — though District Manager Craig Hammerman said he was a bit irked by the way the city went about it.

“We weren’t involved in selecting locations, [so] I can’t tell you the rhyme or reason for why they selected certain areas,” he said.

Williams also felt beholden to a vague, obscure process that didn’t involve her.

“Am I getting some sort of diamond-studded sidewalk?” said Williams. “It’s around $2,000 without being consulted about the need or timing of the work. I have no rights here. It’s very bizarre to me!”

To top it off, the contractor doing the work would only tell Williams that her sidewalks will be replaced sometime this month.

“They don’t tell you when they’re coming, but they’ll bill you for it!” said Williams. “And if they’re going to inconvenience you, tough luck!”

Updated 5:21 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

the view from the front stoop says:
"I have no rights here."

I believe property owners can make arrangements with their own contractors if they think they can get a better price or product. However, the work needs to be done before the city's contractor gets there, usually a couple of weeks after the notice is sent.
Oct. 21, 2010, 10:15 am
Or from Yellow Hook says:
We should cut the trees down for the damage they do to the sidewalks.

The leaves from these trees release CO2 when they disintegrate contributing to global warming climate change and the death of polar bears. The same with compost piles, so you might as well burn the leaves.
Oct. 21, 2010, 11:15 am
Paperbackwriter from Park Slope says:
Please tell me bluestone isn't the sort that has no coefficient of friction when it's the least bit wet, because I'd rather have uneven sidewalks than that vile, dangerous rot.
Oct. 21, 2010, 1:56 pm
cg resident from carroll gardens says:
20 years ago the city came to our house and took out perfectly good flagstone sidewalks (whole block) and replaced with ugly concrete square..charged us
$2000 for something we did not want. Now is block becomes historic they say we will have to pay again to replace the bluestone...The city owns the street, let them pay..someone's brother just got rich...BOO BROOKLYN POLITICIANS
Oct. 22, 2010, 2:36 pm
fluffgirl2000 from gowanas says:
unless its polished the bluestone has a more than acceptable 'coefficient of friction'. even smooth granite is .6 when wet....obviously a new vocab for someone out there...
Oct. 22, 2010, 4:59 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: