DiSanto’s ‘Golden’ moment against Sen. Marty

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Political newcomer Mike DiSanto slammed longtime state Sen. Marty Golden as a “hallway” hack who skipped out on key votes in Albany rather than take controversial positions.

At a debate last week sponsored by the Bay Ridge Council on Aging, the 30-year-old Democratic challenger appeared a bit nervous as he thundered against the 60-year-old Republican stalwart’s failure to vote on the return of state sales tax on clothes and shoes and for “hanging out in the hallway” when the Senate debated a bill that would allow law enforcement to track bullet casings back to the gun from which it was fired.

The Senate ultimately pulled the vote from the floor after realizing the measure wasn’t going to pass.

“Where were you?” DiSanto asked Golden. “Our taxes are going up and you didn’t bother to show up.”

Golden answered calmly, distinguishing himself from the booming DiSanto, whom he referred to condescendingly as a “young man.”

The incumbent admitted that he missed a few votes, but claimed to have made 97 percent of all Senate votes. He then turned the tables on DiSanto, saying that the Democrat “wants to be part of the caucus to raise taxes and fees.”

He also questioned why DiSanto hadn’t voted at all before 2004.

“You blame me for screwing up when I have a 97-percent voting record, but you’re voting record is more inconsiste­nt,” Golden explained.

DiSanto said he didn’t vote before 2004 because he was putting himself through college and was “disillusio­ned” with the voting process at the time.

Golden spent the rest of the debate falling back on what he called his record of service, rattling off the names of the schools and civic programs he’s helped with his legislative earmarks. But that barrel of pork has dried up now that Golden is in the Senate minority.

State figures show that in 2008, just before the Democrats took hold of the senate, Golden brought $2.8 million in member items to the district, which also includes Dyker Heights, Bensonhurst, Sheepshead Bay, Borough Park, Gravesend and Marine Park. Last year, he brought in just $250,000.

But DiSanto’s money woes are apparently just as stark.

At a time when Democrats are trying to further their power base, no one seems to be aiding DiSanto, who has just over $6,000 to wage a campaign. Golden has well over $119,000 to keep his seat, according to campaign finance reports.

Updated 5:21 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Or from Yellow Hook says:
And why is there no party affiliation on Marty's literature?

Ashamed Marty?
Oct. 12, 2010, 1:34 pm
Elaine M. from Bensonhurst says:
Looks like the party is over for Marty.
Oct. 12, 2010, 2:29 pm
Stacy from Bay Ridge says:
Both Candidates have flaws but Marty has been an effective public servent. My vote will go to him because he is the more qualified candidate. Maybe DiSanto will be ready in a few years but he not ready right now.
Oct. 12, 2010, 2:48 pm
L. Corradi from Dyker Heights says:
Attended a debate this evening between these two candidates (and others). Mr. DiSanto seemed VERY unprepared, and blamed the mess up in Albany on "career politicians" but neglected to comprehend that current Assemblyman Peter Abate, Speaker Sheldon Silver, & Governor David Patterson are ALL in the same political party... HIS party... the DEMOCRATIC PARTY! Duh!!!
Oct. 12, 2010, 11:01 pm
Frank from Dyker Heights says:
The party is over for DiSanto, maybe it's time for him to go look for a job, and go back to school.

Class dismissed.
Oct. 13, 2010, 12:42 pm
Sara from Dyker Heights says:
This is from a blog who wrote about last night's debate.
Oct. 13, 2010, 12:45 pm
Amazed from Dyker Heights says:
Is DiSanto the best the Democrats could find?

The boy ain't ready for prime time, and despite what others have commented, he doesn't appear bright enough to ever be ready to do a good job in office.

Marty is not perfect, and his positions on hydrofracking, social issues, and numerous other key votes to come in the next two years are just wrong, wrong, wrong...

but until a candidate who is worth voting for shows up, I will just leave this row blank in November.

Maybe another party could field a worthy opponent in 2012?
Oct. 14, 2010, 11:29 am
THamm from Bensonhurst says:
I went to school with DiSanto and I remember him being very quick tempered and getting into numerous fights with people. I know he is going to NYU for Grad school now but in opinion some things never change. I also heard that he was heavily into drugs at one point.
Nov. 2, 2010, 10:16 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: