Siegel is the only bulldog in the bunch for public advocate

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

There are two ideas competing for our endorsement for the Democratic nomination for public advocate: the notion of getting rid of this vestigial office altogether against the candidacy of Norman Siegel.

But after consideration of all the issues — and the fact that the budget of the public advocate’s office is a mere $1.7 million in a city budget of close to $60 billion — we are happy to both endorse the continuation of the office and Siegel’s qualifications for his party’s nomination.

The Democrats have three other capable men running for the city’s second-highest office: Councilmen Bill DeBlasio (D–Park Slope) and Eric Gioia (D–Queens), and former Public Advocate Mark Green.

Green did a good job with the position for the eight years during which he held it, but he has approached the campaign with a feeling of entitlement that is at best unbecoming and at worst downright arrogant. Democratic voters should reject his has-been candidacy.

Meanwhile, DeBlasio and Gioia would bring an energy to the office that could use it after eight years under Betsy Gotbaum. Both are ambitious men who see the advocate job as a stepping stone to higher office.

But we don’t want a skilled lawmaker as the party’s standard-bearer for the position. We want an attack dog. Norman Siegel is that man.

As a longtime civil rights lawyer and head of the New York Civil Liberties Union, Siegel has led principled fights whenever society runs the risk of being unjust: he’s fought an NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy that tends to only stop and frisk black teens; he’s battled police brutality and worked to create a truly independent Civilian Complaint Review Board; he went down South in the 1960s to win civil rights for millions; he’s unabashedly in favor of gay marriage; and he is a true proponent of free speech.

And his Brooklyn street cred is solid: A decade ago, Siegel defended the Brooklyn Museum when Mayor Giuliani wanted to cut off its funding because of a piece of artwork that the mayor didn’t like. More recently, he spoke out in favor of Kimber VanRy, the Prospect Heights man who got a ticket for drinking a beer on his stoop.

All the Democratic candidates talk about using the public advocate office to help the average Joe fight City Hall. But Siegel is the only one who has never been co-opted by having an office in the building. As such, he is the only one who constantly challenges the old orthodoxies that government insiders follow instinctively. If you watch him during our Community Newspaper Group-sponsored debate, which can be seen on the BoroPolitics Web site, you’ll see that he’s the only Democratic candidate who truly gets it.

We especially like his promise to use the public advocate’s obscure power to drag city agencies to court to root out government impropriety.

Yes, DeBlasio and Gioia have fought for the public during their eight years in office. But Norman Siegel has done it his entire life — at considerable personal risk, mind you. As such, he has earned the Democratic nomination for public advocate.

Updated 5:14 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Daniel from Prospect Heights says:
nice job. to add to Norman Seigel's "Brooklyn cred," he has been an outspoken advocate against Atlantic Yards since 2004, whereas de Blasio still hangs on as an Atlantic Yards supporters, as does Green.

Siegel is perfect for this jobs, he is the only one of the 4 who agitates and advocates with consistency and integrity.
Sept. 4, 2009, 11:16 am
jerry from brighton beach says:
In another addition to Seigel's "Brooklyn Cred" is that he has supported to Keep Seaside Park ,an Open Space Park & respecting the process of transparency when doing a $ 64 million dollar venture. Not turn it into a Privately run commerical Amphitheater. In additon, If Mr. De Blasio is so concerned about NYC finances , why is he doing his Printing & Mailing in Washington DC????
Sept. 8, 2009, 2:58 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: