Downtown tower keeps going and going and going…

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Up, up and away!

Here you go, architecture fans: an updated glimpse of the tallest building in Brooklyn reaching for the stars.

The 491-unit residential tower, slated to top off at 514 feet, or two feet taller than the legendary Williamsburgh Savings Bank Building, is at 111 Lawrence St., between Willoughby Street and the vestigial remnant of Myrtle Avenue, in rapidly changing Downtown.

The bank building, which is at Hanson Place and Flatbush Avenue in nearby Fort Greene, has been the ceiling for Brooklyn since it was built in 1929.

But the gentlemen’s agreement to keep structures below 512 feet was broken two years ago, when the developers of the City Point tower at Albee Square vowed to build a 70-story tower there (though that project is stalled due to the economic downturn).

A year earlier, some Brooklynites were aghast to discover that Frank Gehry’s iconic Miss Brooklyn tower, the trophy skyscraper at the gateway to Bruce Ratner’s Atlantic Yards mega-project, would rise to 620 feet and obscure some views of the bank building’s clocktower. But later that year, Ratner agreed to lower its height to just below 512 feet (though, not to sound like a broken record, the project is stalled due to the economic downturn).

Despite its size, the Lawrence Street tower, developed by the Clarett Group, has been under many people’s radar screens.

“There is nothing sacrosanct about the specific height of the Williamsburgh Bank building,” Simeon Bankoff, the executive director of the Historic Districts Council told The Brooklyn Paper, when the building was first proposed.

That said, Bankoff suggested that he would have preferred a different design.

“It’s more of a case of what we want Brooklyn to look like. Do we want Brooklyn to be the mirror image of the Manhattan skyline?” he said.

Updated 5:12 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Mike from Ft Greene says:
Sadly, this building is absolutely hideous. It doesn't present Brooklyn well.
April 2, 2009, 6:16 pm
Pat from Bay Ridge says:
> "Do we want Brooklyn to be the mirror image of the Manhattan
> skyline?"

Do I want downtown Brooklyn to succeed and build tall buildings, bringing lots of new residents and businesses where there is a very high concentration of subway lines for easy access? Um... yes? Yes, I do. (As long as there's no public support involved, *ahem* Ratner.) I don't understand the nostalgia for a downtown that's run-down and has little going for it, that's so often on display.
April 2, 2009, 8:47 pm
neighbor from downtown says:
where is the photo?
April 3, 2009, 9:49 am
john from ditmas midwood says:
Love the building's height. Love the smashing of the "gentlemen's agreement." But must the building's design be so Broolyn-modest? So self-effacing?
April 7, 2009, 10:44 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: