Sections

March 26, 2009 / Brooklyn news / Politics / Bay Ridge / McMahon on Line 1

The ‘mob’ is angry — but Ridge Rep. votes for cooler heads

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Freshman Rep. Mike McMahon was the only Democrat in New York State to vote against last week’s House bill to put a 90-percent tax on AIG’s “outrageous” (in the words of the president) bonuses.

What the hell is wrong with McMahon — doesn’t he know people are grabbing pitchforks, torches, buckets of tar and down pillows?

That seemed like a good jumping off question for our weekly feature, “McMahon on line 1.”

What, Congressman, the hell is wrong with you?

“A lot of my colleagues here in D.C. were caught up in the passions of the mob,” said McMahon, who was on the losing side of the 328–93 populist-inspired landslide. “The bill went through so quickly that many people weren’t conversant in the details.”

McMahon said the AIG “bonus tax” bill — which has stalled in the Senate, by the way — was flawed for three reasons:

1. It was too broad: It would have covered bonuses received by any employee at any bailed out financial institution with a household income over $250,000.

“So if you work as a bank manager and you’re married to someone, like a principal or a fire battalion chief, who also makes a decent income, suddenly, a bonus that you’ve rightfully earned would be taxed at 90 percent,” he said.

2. It’s unconstitutional: “The government should not use confiscatory tax policy — besides, this was probably a bill of attainder, which is unconstitu­tional,” he added. “It is not something that the legislature of a democracy should be doing. The founding fathers objected to that kind of arbitrary monarchial approach.”

3. Um, it punished an important New York industry: “We can’t tear down the financial-services industry, which is an important economic engine that helps put teachers in the schools, fireman in the firehouse and cops on the street.”

McMahon said he fully understands the anger out there, what with the very Wall Street guys who created the mess walking away with huge bonuses. But now is not the time to lose our heads (or, alas, theirs).

“We have to go after the bad guys, but we can’t throw out the baby with the bathwater,” he said. “Government has to have a reasoned approach to solving problems, not following the headlines on CNN.”

McMahon said he was gratified that many people along the route of the St. Patrick’s Day parade on Sunday cheered him on.

“Several people specifically thanked me for that vote,” he said. “That was very gratifying because you never really know how a vote will be received.”

Updated 5:12 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Michael from Bay Ridge says:
McMahon makes a logical case for his vote, and I'm glad that he thinks things through and doesn't just jump after gut feelings.
Are people really upset with him for this vote, or is that just something the Brooklyn Paper decided to make up?
March 26, 2009, 8:11 am
Pat from Bay Ridge says:
The more important question is, did McMahon approve the original bailout which got us into this mess? You start throwing taxpayer money at private, failing businesses and of course you wind up with unintended consequences like this.
March 26, 2009, 9 am
A O from BKLYN says:
Extra bonus tax is no solution, what ever money they collect will be pennies compared to what we are throwing at them. We need to buy out the company and give all Americans free insurance via them, so there is no need to make car insurance payments twice- one to my company and now a second to AIG via my taxes, I want my free socialist car insurance!! (also life home medical etc. etc.)
March 26, 2009, 1:20 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: