Sections

Yassky: Advertising is garbage!

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

As if advertising wasn’t trashy enough, a city councilman now wants to sell ad space on city garbage cans, saying that the plan could reap $2.5 million.

“The city already generates significant revenue from selling ad space [on other street furniture],” said Councilman David Yassky (D-Brooklyn Heights). “There’s no reason not to sell it on our trash cans when there are companies that will pay to put ads there.”

Under the plan, the city would sell ad space on the roughly 25,000 cans, generating about $100 per receptacle per year, Yassky said.

Selling ad space in the same place that people toss leftovers, litter and dog poop is feasible, said Gene Secunda, an advertising executive and New York University marketing and advertising professor — though he was quick to link the idea to other proposals like a Texas school district that now sells ads on the sides of its buses.

“Yassky’s proposal seems as fitting as many other cash-strapped municipali­ties’ proposals,” Secunda said.

The proposal comes as the city is in the midst of a recent 20-year deal with the Spanish company Cemusa to install newsstands, public toilets, and other street furniture at no cost to the city because the amenities are paid for by the advertising.

Trash cans are not part of the Cemusa deal. Not yet, Yassky said.

But if ads greet us on the subway and buses, what comes next? Audio advertisements on garbage cans that remind passersby to recycle? Ads on the backs of city workers’ uniforms? Video ads in the taxicabs (oh, wait, that one already happened)?

The possibilities, of course, are endless because, Secunda said, nothing is sacred.

“Everything is for sale in these difficult economic times,” he said.

The garbage can advertising would also eliminate the awkward placement of councilmem­bers’ names on sponsored cans within districts, Yassky added. Currently, councilmem­bers’ allocate tax dollars for fancier garbage cans — but the city then emblazons the councilmem­bers’ names onto the cans.

Yassky calls the practice “inappropri­ate” because it looks like free advertising for something he should be doing as part of his job anyway.

(Yassky wrote to Sanitation Commissioner John Doherty last year to ask that his name be removed form the trash cans in his district, and elected officials are now asked whether or not they want their names on the wastebaskets, said agency spokeswoman Kathy Dawkins.)

Not everyone is in favor of the ad proposal. More advertising would just further clutter the city and hardly make a dent in the city’s finances, said the founder of the Anti-Advertising Agency, an artist collective.

“I think that $2.5 million sounds like a lot of money, especially when the banks are tanking, but it’s … like a drop in the bucket” compared to the city’s $60-billion budget, said Agency founder Steve Lambert. “Putting more ads in the city doesn’t make the city more livable.”

Updated 5:08 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

anon from brooklyn heights says:
It is better to get some income from the city for the garbage cans then to let politicans like Yassky advertise themselves on the garbage cans. I for one think that having a supposed green candidate like Yassky adveritse himelf on garbage cans at out expense illustrates David for the self serviving- my career first pol he is
Sept. 24, 2008, 10:16 am
Michael from Park Slope says:
And all this time I had only THOUGHT it was garbage, these ads to the left of me/ right of me, sound and fury signifying nothing.
Sept. 24, 2008, 4:49 pm
Steve Lambert from Williamsburg says:
2.5 Million Dollars is .004% of the 60 Billion dollar budget.
Sept. 24, 2008, 7:04 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: