Poly alumni still object to merger

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A new state Senate report blasts this year’s merger of New York University and Polytechnic University as flawed — and defiant Polytechnic alumni, who have been unsuccessful in their bid to prevent the Downtown engineering campus from being taken over by the Manhattan-based liberal arts school, are saying, “We told you so.”

Some board members and alumni of the 154-year-old Downtown Brooklyn university have sought to squelch the merger with the expansionist Greenwich Village academy, claiming conflicts of interests and a 1973 state agreement that suggested that NYU is barred from having an engineering program.

Amid such charges, state Sen. Kenneth LaValle (R–Long Island) negotiated a 30-day postponement of the Feburary merger vote so he could proceed with an inquiry.

After that delay, the boards of both schools voted to join the two institutions, which must be approved by the state Board of Regents.

LaValle’s just-released report dismissed some the alleged misconduct — but it did criticize Polytechnic for these improprieties:

• “The affiliation negotiations between Polytech and NYU were being conducted by [Poly] President Jerry Hultin months before they were announced to the rest of the Board.”

• “Board members who were not supportive of the affiliation were excluded or marginalized from the working committees set up [to] address affiliation.”

• “An updated appraisal of Polytech’s real property was never obtained.”

Anti-merger forces said the findings buttressed their ongoing opposition to NYU’s acquisition of their alma mater.

“This fits into what we’ve been saying all along — that it’s been rushed for no reason,” said Edward Sawchuck.

Officials at NYU did not respond to requests for comment. Poly Board Chairman Craig Matthews said in a statement that LaValle’s report “expressed no basis to object to the merger.”

He said both schools would move ahead to “secure approval by the Board of Regents” — and the result would be a “top-tier research, technology, and engineering institution that will benefit our students, New York City, the nation and the world.”

Updated 5:06 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Norman Oder says:
Here's a link to more coverage and the report:
June 5, 2008, 10:22 pm
Ray Turner from Poly Alum (formerly Brooklyn) says:
Regardless of how many alumni agree with the merger, the alumni president, in my opinion, continues to misrepresent my views. The alumni leadership objected from "day one". It really makes little difference how much other alumni and I approve of the merger. It is my belief that we will never be heard over what appears to be a bias agenda. I say this as one who has excelled at Poly, but can tell you more than you care to know about bias outside of our dear "Poly"... where my race is the issue, not my intelligence. Submitted with all due respect.
June 11, 2008, 2:40 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: