Adrift on the Canal

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The Gowanus Canal is a national disgrace, a toxin- and sewage-filled corpse of water that has been left to molder during decades of neglect by city, state and federal authorities.

Other cities — notably San Antonio —have cleaned up their once-polluted waterways and turned them into residential communities and tourist attractions, but our Gowanus Canal still cuts through the prosperous neighborhoods of Park Slope, Carroll Gardens and Cobble Hill like a Third World gutter, a smelly culvert that divides Brooklyn physically and psychically.

For decades, there has been talk of cleaning up the waterway, but talk — and government — has been cheap. City officials did manage to reopen a valve that flushes relatively clean water from New York Harbor through the canal, but that has only made the Gowanus more habitable to fish.

In the meantime, government hasn’t bothered with the heavy lifting — fixing an antiquated sewer system so that raw sewage no longer cascades into the canal during heavy rainfall. And now, the federal government says it would be satisfied if the canal could make it up to the level of being a spawning ground for fish.

That ruling was fine for lower aquatic life, but it basically sold us all down the river.

But there is an alternative to government buck-passing: Develop the canal zone as a residential community.

Right now, the city is moving to rezone properties along the canal from manufacturing to residential use. And even before that process begins, a major developer, Toll Brothers, has announced its plan for a 577-unit development on the west bank of the canal between Carroll and Second streets.

Another waterfront site further south, long known as “the Public Place,” is also being redeveloped into a residential community with open space and a canal-front esplanade.

Predictably, naysayers in the community are fighting the rezoning out of distrust of developers.

But the only way to create a community that’s actually invested in the health of the canal is to create a community that lives along the canal. Otherwise, there’s no pressure on elected officials to do anything, no constituency to which the pols have to answer.

A meeting this week showcased how much hostility there is to development. When one Toll Brothers representative asked if opponents would prefer retaining the filthy canal in exchange for no development, some people — shockingly — said yes.

Updated 5:05 pm, July 9, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

go go from Gowanus says:
"no constituency to which the pols have to answer"

what? there are lots of us living here already?

what kind of crap are trying to pull here?
March 7, 2008, 8:01 pm
Margaret from Gowanus says:
I guess now it is pretty clear that the Brooklyn Paper supports residential development along the Gowanus Canal - buying the line that only development will clean it up.
Ironic that you are against the Ratner plan to overdevelop Brooklyn, but overdeveloping along an environmentally complex and heavily polluted area is ok. I wish you would not only view those of us who are protesting this as a bunch of nay-saying cooks. This is our community. We are educated about what is going on here. And we will feel the effects of this more than anyone.
March 8, 2008, 12:36 am
Barbara from Clinton Hill says:
Having attended the Unity Conference re: the Atlantic Yards development last yr, I was very shocked to learn that residents of the Gowanus area are ALREADY having to live with sewage in their basements and on certain streets when it rains and the the City of NY's Health Dept. does not seem to ACT??? Yet, more development can be built? This is crazy and subjects those poor residents and the rest of us to untold health crisises in one of the largest, if not the largest, US Cities, in the world's richest country. How can anyone advocate more development when the sewage system can not tolerate what is already built???
March 11, 2008, 4:06 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: