Sections

Ratner’s Yards pretty dense

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:



A new analysis by a noted Brooklyn architect indicates that the Atlantic Yards project is just as bulky as the state’s plans for Ground Zero.

The architect, Johnathan Cohn, came up with the startling conclusion that the 17-acre residential and office village slated to surround Bruce Ratner’s proposed Nets arena would include as much built space, per acre, as the Ground Zero project, which will include more than 8 million square feet of office and commercial space plus the world’s tallest building, the Freedom Tower.

Cohn used a standard city zoning measurement called the floor-to-area ratio, or FAR, to compare Ground Zero’s bulk with that of Ratner’s 9.1-million-square-foot residential and commercial development.

To calculate a FAR, building area is divided by site acreage.

Cohn said he relied solely on the developer’s own square-footage numbers, but subtracted the arena — as well as existing streets that will be demapped and incorporated into the project — so that his numbers would reflect the situation at the remaining 17 acres.

As a result, he calculated that the residential and commercial component of the project has a FAR of 12 — just a miniscule .12 lower than the bulk of what is proposed for Ground Zero.

“Whether it’s all in four towers or spread over 18, we are talking about the same ratio of building to area,” said the number-crunching architect, a blogger at brooklynviews.blogspot.com.

Because it is a state project that doesn’t fall under city code, Atlantic Yards would exceed the maximum permissible FAR in Prospect Heights. If approved, it will be the largest development ever built in Brooklyn.

Prospect Heights artist Jon Keegan’s visual simulation of the Atlantic Yards project seems to back up Cohn’s concern about the project’s bulk.

Keegan created the simulation (see photo above) by punching the developer’s own figures into Google Earth, which can superimpose digitally manufactured images onto a satellite picture of a place.

The developer didn’t respond to calls about the simulation or Cohn’s FAR numbers, but has said in the past that the project could shrink following its environmental review.

Even as the developer refused to criticize Keegan’s rendering, plenty of online critics did — although not the way Ratner might have.

Several slammed the artist for not including renderings of all the other supposedly oversized buildings in the area that are in the planning phase — many of which will have jerked up the skyline by the time Atlantic Yards is built.



Updated 4:00 pm, November 10, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: