Sections

You call this art? Where’s the dung?

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

So this is what all the fuss was about? That art show that got banned by the Parks Department because it was “inappropri­ate” for children and veterans opened late last week in DUMBO — and I was first on line.

Anything inappropriate for kids and killers — that’s good enough for me.

Of course, nothing could match the good old days of controversial art — like back at the turn of the century, when Rudy Giuliani tried to shut down the Brooklyn Museum because some artist put a few pieces of elephant dung and some cutouts from porno mags on a painting of the Virgin Mary.

I thought the grand dame looked great.

Compared to that, the Brooklyn College student art show, Plan B, is tame. There are plenty of portraits of smiling people, lots of shapeless sculptures that look like pieces of a sci-fi set, plenty of abstract paintings and even a really really big office chair.

On opening night, I even saw a guy in a suit writing a check to one of the artists — an indication that not everyone thought the show was “inappropri­ate.”

But the real good news is that there are plenty of pieces that rise to the level of good old dirty art.

Take the masturbating hand sculpture that Brooklyn Parks Commissioner Julius Spiegel called “inappropri­ate.” Yes, it is a sculpture of a hand gripping a penis. Yes, the penis is erect. But the backlit sculpture, like the three others in Augusto Marin’s series, is covered in a gauzy cloth that makes it resemble a religious icon like the Shroud of Turin. Only a cultural boor (paging Herr Spiegel?) could fail to see the quality of the work or ignore the point Marin is trying to make about the perpetual clash between the “sacred” and the “profane.”

So much had been written about Carl James Ferrero’s painting about Dick Cheney in a homosexual clinch that I was almost disappointed when I finally saw it.

Yeah, it’s good art, I guess; Ferrero has a nifty watercolor style that contrasts with the visceral texts that run alongside the images.

What bothered me is that there wasn’t really anything controversial about the “Dick Cheney” painting. The gay affair mentioned in the text has nothing to do with the vice president, but centers around a man who uses the screen name “Dick Cheney” as he trolls for dates. That’s about as controversial as shooting a hunting partner.

Much better is another of Ferrero’s watercolors, this one a recounting of a different gay coupling. Although it starts with one man asking the other to urinate on him, it ends with a universal message. “How much did this place cost?” the urinator wonders as he looks around his partner’s apartment.

To me, that’s great art. I haven’t urinated on anyone since I was 3, but I do spend a lot of time wondering what people’s apartments cost.

Plan B runs through June 16 at 70 Washington St. in DUMBO. Free.



Gersh Kuntzman is the Editor of The Brooklyn Paper. E-mail Gersh at gkuntzman@cnglocal.com
Updated 4:00 pm, November 10, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: