Sections

Pols to MTA: Not so fast

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:



Two Brooklyn elected officials this week called on the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to extend the bidding process for development rights over the Atlantic Avenue rail yards, saying the city should first be allowed to come up with an overall plan for the site.

Brooklyn Heights Councilman David Yassky and Park Slope Assemblyman James Brennan, both of whom had previously been silent on the controversial development plan, this week fired off a letter to the MTA board calling for the bid process to be left open.

Other officials, including Brooklyn Heights Assemblywoman Joan Millman, were poised to sign the letter, according to a City Council official, but pulled out at the last minute.

“The Assembly member wants to meet with Forest City Ratner first,” said Sam Cooper, Millman’s chief of staff. “She just wanted to express her concerns to Forest City Ratner first, and then express her concerns to the public.

“She has not officially endorsed the [Ratner] project,” he added.

Yassky, who has previously said he supports an arena and development over the rail yards which, bounded by Dean Street and Flatbush, Atlantic and Vanderbilt avenues, lie outside of his district (though a new parcel of the development site within his district was recently announced), said his main problem is not with the specific proposal but the lack of public review and city input.

“I have previously said that the project should go through ULURP [the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure] because I really do not — I just think it’s not right to shut out the usual method of community participation and elected official participat­ion,” Yassky told The Brooklyn Papers this week.

Brennan said he, too, supported the city creating guidelines for the site.

“There have been no hearings, nor has the outcome of any mitigation proposals been prepared to deal with the impacts of subway, bus, or anything involving what environmental impact studies are supposed to,” said Brennan. “None of this has happened.

“By putting the yards out to bid, with a competition in which density and money go together to bid for site control, you create a situation in which the MTA is forcing any development to have maximum density.”

Yassky also raised issue with the MTA setting development imperatives of which the city must later bear the brunt.

“My fear is that if the MTA locks a developer into a high sale price, then the developer turns around and says, ‘Now I have to build 50-story towers to make the money back,’” Yassky said.

“I don’t want that to be the dynamic,” he said. “To me, the rational way to do this is for the responsible governmental bodies to decide how much development they’re going to authorize, and then the MTA can pick a bidder to do it.

“Otherwise you create the dynamic of people bidding to do bigger buildings,” said Yassky. “I don’t see what the justification would be for circumventing the rezoning process.”



Updated 4:00 pm, November 10, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: