Sections

City Planning OK’s Ikea

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:



In a unanimous vote, the City Planning Commission on Wednesday approved the proposal to build an Ikea megastore on the Red Hook waterfront.

The 9-0 vote leaves the plan’s fate in the hands of the City Council, which will next hold a public hearing and has 50 days to render a decision.

The project, which promises the community job opportunities and a public esplanade, has nevertheless deepened the socioeconomic divide in Red Hook.

The Swedish home furnishings store, which markets its products to largely middle-income consumers across the country, would be the first within the five boroughs. Some Red Hook residents say the area will not be able to handle the traffic and that the waterfront, with its prized views of the Statue of Liberty and New York Harbor, could be put to better use.

But the company has galvanized a following among residents of the Red Hook Houses, a series of low-income public housing projects that comprise 75 percent of Red Hook’s population. Unemployment within the Red Hook Houses is near 20 percent.

The City Planning Commission approval was the latest step in the review process for the plan, which has already won the endorsement of Borough President Marty Markowitz, and Community Board 6. Red Hook Councilwoman Sara Gonzalez has stated her support for the plan.

Amanda Burden, the director of City Planning and chairwoman of the commission, carefully worded her vote of approval at the meeting, and emphasized that her reasons for favoring the project stood in response to a need for employment opportunities in the area.

“Having spent four years building a community justice center in Red Hook,” she said, describing a project she had worked on prior to her role in the planning commission, “I know how acutely this community needs job opportunities. The job-training program by Ikea is essential to my vote.”

Burden also said that while the issue of transportation problems is an unknown, it was one that would be monitored while the development proceeded. Ikea has agreed to conduct a traffic impact study that will commence prior to construction of the 346,000-square-foot store. That study is to be completed by Ikea within a year.

While other commissioners voiced enthusiasm for the waterfront green space that Ikea would build and for the expected flow of money into the borough, few aired the concerns over neighborhood traffic or long-term waterfront development and beautification that so many local residents who have opposed the project have treated as urgent priorities.

“I’m still not convinced this is the best location for this project; however, I am impressed by the esplanade and do agree with the need for jobs,” said Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz’s appointee to the commission, Dolly Williams.

Following the hearing, Ikea representatives shared celebratory hugs in the hallway.

“We’re thrilled,” said Ikea spokeswoman Joni Yoswein. “We believe that the commission was thoughtful and their diligence to make sure that this project was the right thing made us work harder. It’s never a shoe-in, and it never should be in this city. It should be hard to build.”

Among the concessions the company made was a 30-day period during which only residents of the 11231 ZIP code, which includes Red Hook, can apply for jobs.

Beyond that, said Ray Hall, director of the community group Red Hook Rise, Ikea owes the community no commitments. Hall’s organization, which serves to empower minority youth — primarily from the Red Hook Houses — believes Ikea’s just being there will be enough.

“It’s a blessing that people [the commission] realize it, and the need for jobs. If it wasn’t a good thing they wouldn’t have supported it,” he said upon hearing the commission’s verdict.

Hall said he plans to “make sure that they do their part, what they agreed to in the beginning,” but doesn’t want or need a commitment on hiring from the company.

“I expect the same commitment that they do for all the other stores. They’re not doing anything special for Red Hook,” he said, adding that the jobs would speak for themselves to the unemployed.

He voiced some resentment that the plan wasn’t supported by the whole of Red Hook and felt frustrated at what he perceived as discrimination on the part of his middle-class neighbors.

“They don’t want to see the people get out of poverty, they want people to stay stuck in time so they can take over,” Hall charged. “We’re going to fight for this community, based on what we were 20 years ago.”

An outspoken community leader against the Ikea plan, Lou Sones said that despite the omnipresent talk of jobs, he never saw a majority of residents show up at any meeting in support of the plan. He specifically noted the commission’s hearing on July 28.

“Twice as many people showed up against it as for it — 30 arguments were against it and one for it,” said Sones. “We can have 10 times the amount of jobs with waterfront-appropriate use, that’s a no-brainer for anybody with a vision.”

He defined “waterfront appropriate” as development that is waterfront dependent and waterfront necessary, such as nice restaurants, hotels and “even luxury housing units.”

“The political fix is in,” Sones said, somewhat resignedly. “So it doesn’t matter what’s good for Brooklyn, what’s good for New York, the deal’s already been made in the back room.”

Sones said the only consolation he had was his belief that the store would sink, financially.

“I just think it’s going to be too hard to get to. The store will fail,” he predicted. “They will lose money. They will be a business failure. That’s the only reason I’m not shooting myself in the head right now.”


Updated 4:00 pm, November 10, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: