Sections

The real story is the land grab, not the Nets

The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:



That the Nets are coming is beside the point. And that is the real story, a story masterfully buried by developer Bruce Ratner and his media shills. (When the New York Times is your real estate partner, it’s amazing the story its pages will tell — more than three pages featuring nine upbeat, luciously illustrated stories in Thursday’s edition.)

The real story is that the Atlantic Yards project — and its companion Downtown Brooklyn Plan — is not about the Nets (whose stadium would occupy a tiny part of the massive site), it’s about a land grab by Ratner and his political clients, the largest, most expensive government seizure of private property for private benefit ever in Brooklyn.

Let’s dispose of the sidebar first: Atlantic Terminal is probably the best site in town for a Nets arena, just as it would have been for the Dodgers in the ’50s.

The site’s residential neighbors might not like to hear this, but the Flatbush-Atlantic area is too good a hub to leave fallow, and they should have suspected that Ratner’s early step there — the ugly, dysfunctional, failed Atlantic Center shopping mall he opened in the ’90s and his takeover of the Manhattan-centric, expansionist (in a real estate, if not an artistic, vein) Brooklyn Academy of Music — was little more than a holding action.

With virtually no public consultation (and no request for competing proposals), Gov. Pataki is apparently prepared to condemn enough privately-owned property to allow a potential build-out of more than 14 million square feet, the equivalent of seven Empire State buildings.

Ratner’s architect (sorry, the media’s been instructed to say “world renowned” architect) Frank Gehry said his intent is to build a neighborhood from scratch. Brooklyn’s been hot for a number of years, and not because there’s nothing here worth preserving.

People live in Brooklyn (and pay millions for homes in neighborhoods abutting the condemned sites) for many reasons, not the least of which is it’s not Manhattan but close to it, and it’s not the kind of sterile, suburban campus represented by Ratner’s Metrotech which, contrary to popular but uninformed opinion, is anything but a smashing success.


Updated 4:00 pm, November 10, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: