for The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

When pitching the cinema of South Korea, Sueyoung Park of the New York-based group Korean Film Forum is apt to reach for common ground with Western movies.

Korean movies address "universal themes of love, friendship, crime, violence, politics and gender [and] reflect technological sophistication comparable to Hollywood films," she says. From the point of view of Western cineastes, this accessibility is a double-edged sword.

It’s true that in their storytelling technique, visual codes and acting style, Korea’s movies feel more like America’s than those of any other Asian film industry. Yet, looking at the precedents of Hong Kong action flicks, Indian musicals or even the Japanese classics, the fuel for cult status has been unfamiliarity - the revelatory sensation of watching something from another world.

Despite its less flashy nature, contemporary Korean film has earned plenty of attention the past few years, becoming a staple of film festivals worldwide and enjoying success in Asia and Europe and even an occasional release in the subtitle-allergic United States. Now, Korean Film Forum has joined BAMcinematek to help Brooklyn audiences play catch-up with a retrospective of eight recent works Aug. 23-25. (The selection is culled from the New York Korean Film Festival 2002, which runs Aug. 16-23 at Anthology Film Archives in Manhattan.)

Park credits the industry’s current success partially to "the originality and quality of the films," but readily admits to the importance of screen quotas introduced by the government in the 1990s, requiring theaters to offer homegrown product at least 106 days out of the year.

"It’s only been since 1999 that Korean cinema has been able to stand on its own against Hollywood blockbusters," says Park. "Back in 1988, when the import restriction on foreign film was lifted and Korean films had to compete directly with Hollywood and Hong Kong films, Korean films gradually lost their market share to a low 16 percent by 1993."

By contrast, when the 2001 Korean box office was totaled, domestic films had a nearly 50-percent share. In 1998, the government had made noises about reducing the screen quota to 92 days. A storm of protests by industry professionals, which saw some shaving their heads and others marching with their own funeral portraits, put that plan in the deep freeze.

"I’m certain the debate isn’t over, though," notes Park, "as there are continuing pressures from the U.S. government and theater owners to change or remove the system."

Writing by e-mail from South Korea, writer-director Yoon Jong-chan scoffs, "The argument that a film industry ought not to be protected by government mandates is the logic only of Hollywood distributors. Why does a giant try to fight and compete with a little boy? Of course, I don’t mean ’screen quotas’ will be needed forever It’s a matter of time."

Yoon already has enough trouble creating the films he wants. "It is very hard to make art-house films in Korea," he says, no doubt thinking of his 2001 feature debut, "Sorum," which opens the BAM series on Aug. 23. This is one of a recent spate of Asian films (such as Korea’s "Memento Mori" or Japan’s "Audition" and "Pulse") that can be shoehorned into the "horror" slot but use the conventions so obliquely that they barely qualify for the genre label.

"Sorum" concentrates on "the isolation and alienation experienced by the socially and physically marginalized characters" who happen to live in a ramshackle housing block cursed with a haunted apartment, Park observes.

"Audiences who visited the theater with a box of popcorn to watch a spooky horror movie were disappointed," Yoon says. "From the beginning, I was not interested in a ’ghost story.’ Rather, what I wanted to express was the fear and tragedy resulting from the absurdity, stupidity and greed of human beings." The film bears out Yoon’s claim, even while his words sell short the clammy anxiety "Sorum" is capable of inducing in a number of scenes.

Yoon disagrees with Park’s claims about originality. "Current Korean films are very much commercial" and derivative, he asserts. He makes a comparison to Hong Kong cinema, which gorged on action crowd-pleasers during its heyday in the ’80s and early ’90s and then slumped badly.

"[This decline] is a warning for the future of the Korean film industry," said Yoon. "In order to avoid repeating the mistakes of Hong Kong cinema, a wide spectrum of films should be produced."

Where one thinks Kwak Kyung-Taek’s "Friend" (screening Aug. 24) fits into this picture depends one’s outlook. Last year, the lavish crime melodrama sold almost twice the number of tickets its nearest competitor did and stomped the country’s all-time box office record.

"Friend" follows four childhood pals over 20 years while two of them descend into underworld rivalry and bloodshed. Supposedly autobiographical, it feels like a medley of elements from Asian gangster movies and coming-of-age school stories, as well as seminal American mob movies like "Mean Streets" and "Once Upon a Time in America."

Park attributes the success of its themes of friendship and loyalty to nostalgia for the ’70s and early ’80s childhood of the characters and to its swooning visual poetry. (Korea may make the prettiest films on earth right now.) Whatever the reasons, "Friend" heralds an unprecedented power for domestic filmmaking, while questions persist in some quarters about how healthy it is for any one movie to dominate theaters.

The crime blockbuster of 2002 has so far been the far less lyrical and sentimental "Public Enemy," (screening Aug. 23) from Kang Woo-Suk, the director, producer and movie mogul widely considered the industry’s most powerful individual. It’s certainly the down-and-dirty work of a crowd-pleaser, with more noggin-smacking than a Three Stooges feature, about three profanities per subtitle and a scruffy detective protagonist so corrupt his own mother nags, "Can’t tell if you’re a policeman or a gangster."

When his moral outrage is reawakened by a slick, yuppie psycho-killer, the detective sets out to deliver vigilante-style justice with which the audience is clearly expected to sympathize.

The festival’s cinematic perp walk also includes Ryu Seung-Wan’s noir action yarn "No Blood, No Tears" (2001; screens Aug. 25), a female twist on the one-big-heist sub-genre.

But the retrospective doesn’t neglect the independent filmmakers whose more personal work first drew the attention of international critics to Korea. Hong Sang-Soo received probably his widest acclaim to date with the bitter romantic-sexual triangle "Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors" (2000; screens Aug. 25). The erotic title notwithstanding, this is an understated slice of life rendered in clean black-and-white and long, still camera takes. Despite this austere gaze, it is touching, witty and compassionate in its portrayal of the disconnect between the genders and the ways sex can warp relationships and male egos.

Park also makes particular note of first-time director Jeong Jae-eun’s award-winning, female coming-of-age piece, "Take Care of My Cat" (2001; screens Aug. 25). "She represents a growing number of talented female directors in Korea to keep watch on," he says.

Kim Dae-Seung’s "Bungee Jumping of Their Own" (2001; screens Aug. 24) could be usefully noted here as a successful hybrid of the indie and populist sensibilities. But by all means, avoid reading the plot-spoiling synopsis in the official schedule. The first act is a charming romance about a college odd couple. So far, so cozy. But then comes a breathtaking, quasi-supernatural twist, and the story blooms like some exotic flower into a wrenching fable of regret and obsession.

Perhaps the hero could use a touch of the memory-erasing "oblivion virus" in Moon Seung-Wook’s science fiction drama "The Butterfly" (2001; screens Aug. 24), a low-budget, digital video award-winner that also crossbreeds popular conventions with the offbeat and personal.

So is the glass half empty or half full?

"It’s a very exciting time for the Korean film industry," says Park. "The government and the industry have recognized this potential, and we’re seeing more investments being funneled to the industry and we’ll probably see more growth as a result. Kang Woo-Suk’s film academy is set to open in the fall to give free education to five to 10 Korean students on all aspects of filmmaking for the next five years."

In counterpoint, Yoon laments, "Compared to contemporary Japanese or Chinese cinema, Korean cinema seems to have fallen behind in maintaining its distinctive identity. The Korean film industry looks like an overheated stock market - it is booming now, but it’s in a very unstable situation and nobody knows when capital will be withdrawn from it.

"What is really required to continue the vitality of the industry," he says, "is talented people who have discerning eyes."

Grateful acknowledgment is made to Darcy’s Korean Film Page ( for research assistance.


"New Korean Cinema" will run Aug. 23 through Aug. 25 at BAMcinematek, 30 Lafayette Ave. at Ashland Place. Tickets are $9, $6 seniors 65 and over, children under 12. For movie times and information, visit or on the Web or call BAM at (718) 636-4100.

Updated 4:00 pm, November 10, 2010
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: